MILWAUKEE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: DIAMOND INDUSTRIES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DIAMOND INDUSTRIES, INC. in 307 W. LAYTON AVE., MILWAUKEE, WI 53207 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 335617981.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DIAMOND INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Site address
- 307 W. LAYTON AVE.
- City
- MILWAUKEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53207
- Mailing
- 307 W. LAYTON AVE., MILWAUKEE, WI 53207
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: (a) The employer did not develop a complete Lockout/Tagout program in that it was missing, elements such as but not limited to: scope, purpose, periodic inspections, release from lockout or tagout, testing or positioning of machines, outside personnel (contractors, etc.), group lockout or tagout and shift or personnel changes. This exposed employees to unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: (a) The employer did not develop procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy for authorized personnel to follow when accomplishing set-up, maintenance, and servicing for equipment such as but not limited to: Accurshear, Bamtam Press (Hydraulic), Denison Multipress, Accurpress Hydraulic Press Brake, and Wiedematic MachII. This exposed employees to unexpected start up or release of stored energy.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, or were placed in service if the examination showed conditions adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle: (a) The Nissan Propane Forklift and Daewoo Propane Forklift were not inspected prior to being placed in service.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) The Webb Takisawa lathe was missing the work-holding device (chuck) guard exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): (a) The Accurshear had inadequate guarding for the point of operation exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.147 C07 IV
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iv): The employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date: (a) The employer did not certify authorized, affected, and other employees had received training regarding Lockout/Tagout and was not kept up to date.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Diamond Industries, INC.
View Diamond Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335617981.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.