Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COPELAND COATING COMPANY, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of COPELAND COATING COMPANY, INC. in 36000 US ROUTE 20, NASSAU, NY 12123 (NAICS 324121). OSHA activity number 335631594.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Copeland Coating Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Copeland Coating Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
36000 US ROUTE 20
City
NASSAU
State
NY
ZIP
12123
Mailing
PO BOX 595, NASSAU, NY 12123
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324121
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced

Hazardous substances 07009010

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 1910.1349(c)(1)(i)-(ix) with worksite-specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees required to don Moldex full face respirators and/or 3M 7502 1/2 mask respirators when entering permit required confined space tanks containing Action Pave Regular Sealer. The sealer contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, Coal Tar Pitch. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program.     b). On or about 08/09/2012, on site, for employees required to don MSA N95 1/2 mask respirators when working in the clay area. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program.     Abatement Note:    The following are the specific areas that need to be written in the program:  1910.134(c)(1)(ii) Medical evaluations of employees  1910.134(c)(1)(iii) Fit testing procedures  1910.134(c)(1)(iv) Procedures for proper use of respirators  1910.134(c)(1)(v) Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, and discarding.   1910.134(c)(1)(vii) Training of employees of the respiratory hazards.  1910.134(c)(1)(viii) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators.  1910.134(c)(1)(ix) Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace:    a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees required to don Moldex full face respirators and/or 3M 7502 1/2 mask respirators when entering permit required confined space tanks containing Action Pave Regular Sealer. The sealer contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, Coal Tar Pitch.The employer did not conduct an evaluation to identify if respiratory hazards existed in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees required to don Moldex full face respirators and/or 3M 7502 1/2 mask respirators when entering permit required confined space tanks containing Action Pave Regular Sealer. The sealer contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, Coal Tar Pitch. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include medical evaluations.     b). On or about 08/09/2012, on site, for employees required to don MSA N95 1/2 mask respirators when working in the clay area. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees required to don Moldex full face respirators and/or 3M 7502 1/2 mask respirators when entering permit required confined space tanks containing Action Pave Regular Sealer. The sealer contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, Coal Tar Pitch. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include fit tests.     b). On or about 08/09/2012, on site, for employees required to don MSA N95 1/2 mask respirators when working in the clay area. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include fit tests.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators:     a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees required to don Moldex full face respirators and/or 3M 7502 1/2 mask respirators when entering permit required confined space tanks containing Action Pave Regular Sealer. The sealer contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, Coal Tar Pitch. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include training.     b). On or about 08/09/2012, on site, for employees required to don MSA N95 1/2 mask respirators when working in the clay area. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0700

29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): The employer did not develop and implement a written permit space program that complies with this section:    a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees that enter Action Pave Regular Sealer tanks that contain coal tar pitch. The employer deemed the entries to the tanks as permit required confined space entries. The employer did not develop and implement a site specific written program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.146 D02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0700

29 CFR 1910.146(d)(2): The employer did not identify and evaluate the hazards of permit spaces before employees enter them:    a). On or about 01/08/2013, on site, for employees that enter Action Pave Regular Sealer tanks that contain coal tar pitch. The employer deemed the entries to the tanks as permit required confined space entries. The employer did not identify and evaluate the hazards of permit spaces prior to entry.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0700

29 CFR 1910.146(f)(7): The entry permit that documents compliance with this section and authorizes entry to a permit space did not identify the hazards of the permit space to be entered:    a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees that enter Action Pave Regular Sealer tanks that contain coal tar pitch. The employer deemed the entries to the tanks as permit required confined space entries. The permits maintained by the employer did not identify the hazards of the permit space to be entered.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.146 D14

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0700

29 CFR 1910.146(d)(14): The employer did not review the permit space program, using the canceled permits retained under paragraph (e)(6) of this section within 1 year after each entry and revise the program as necessary, to ensure that employees participating in entry operations are protected from permit space hazards:     a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees that enter Action Pave Regular Sealer tanks that contain coal tar pitch. The employer deemed the entries to the tanks as permit required confined space entries. The employer maintained permits on site. However, the employer did not review the permits aas part of a permit-required confine space program.        NOTE: Employers may perform a single annual review covering all entries performed during a 12-month period. If no entry is performed during a 12-month period, no review is necessary.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.146 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0700

29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work is regulated by this section acquire the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under this section:    a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees that enter Action Pave Regular Sealer tanks that contain coal tar pitch. The employer deemed the entries to the tanks as permit required confined space entries. The employer did not provide training on the requirements for permit-required confined space entries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 D09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0700

29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9): The employer did not develop and implement procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services, for rescuing entrants from permit spaces, for providing necessary emergency services to rescued employees, and for preventing unauthorized personnel from attempting a rescue:    a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees serving as attendant and trained in rescue of an employee from inside confined spaces of Action Pave Regular Sealer tanks that contain coal tar pitch. The employer did not develop procedures for summoning rescues and emergency services.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.146 K01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0700

29 CFR 1910.146(k)(1)(ii): The employer did not evaluate a prospective rescue service's ability, in terms of proficiency with rescue-related tasks and equipment, to function appropriately while rescuing entrants from the particular permit space or types of permit spaces identified:    a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, the employer did not evaluate the Nassau Hose Company #1 and the Troy Fire Department's ability to rescue employees from permit spaces at its establishment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 K02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0700

29 CFR 1910.146(k)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure that affected employees practice making permit space rescues at least once every 12 months, by means of simulated rescue operations in which they remove dummies, manikins, or actual persons from the actual permit spaces or from representative permit spaces:      a). On or about 8/9/12, on site, for employees serving as attendant and trained in rescue of an employee from inside confined spaces of Action Pave Regular Sealer tanks that contain coal tar pitch. The employer did not provide annual rescue training for the employees that woud have a active role in permit space entries and rescues.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,071 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    a). On or about 01/18/2013, on site, for employees that use LOTO procedures when cleaning Action Pave Regular Sealer tanks that contain coal tar pitch several times throughout the year. The employer did not implement a written program to include procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1071
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.178 L04 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(i): Refresher training, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of that training, was not conducted as required by paragraph (l)(4)(ii) to ensure that the operator has the knowledge and skills needed to operate the powered industrial truck safely:    a). On or about 8/9/12, on site, for the forklift operator that drives the forklift on a daily basis. The employer provided initial training 3 years ago. The employer failed to implement refresher training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L06

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:    a). On or about 8/9/12, on site, for the forklift operator that drives the forklift on a daily basis. The employer provided initial training 3 years ago. The employer failed to certify the operator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Copeland Coating Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335631594.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.