Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: SPEC PROCESSING GROUP, INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SPEC PROCESSING GROUP, INC in 548 ROSEDALE RAOD, KENNETT SQUARE, PA 19348 (NAICS 325314). OSHA activity number 335637187.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Spec Processing Group, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Spec Processing Group, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
548 ROSEDALE RAOD
City
KENNETT SQUARE
State
PA
ZIP
19348
Mailing
4023 KENNETT PIKE SUITE 242, GREENVILLE, DE 19807
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325314
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b):     The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:      a) Spec Processing Group (Fertl Soil): Employees (Soil Workers) operated a forklift in the bagging area of the barn where five exhausted propane cylinders, one partially filled propane cylinder and one exhausted actylene cylinder were unsecured. The employer did not ensure that the cylinders were secured to prevent fire and other physical hazards. On or about August 2, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $780
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l):    a) Spec Processing Group (Fertl Soil): Employees (Soil Workers) moved pallets of packaged soil products in the barn  around other employees as well as unsecured gas cylinders iin the area with a Yale Model GDP050V forklift. The employer did not ensure that each person operating the forklift was trained to operate the forklift. On or about August 2, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $780
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a) Spec Processing Group (Fertl Soil): Employees, (Soil Workers) while moving and bagging soil and sand products, were exposed to silica. The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program for employees working with the silica containing products on the site. On or about August 2, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $780
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:      a) Spec Processing Group (Fertl Soil): Employees, (Soil Workers) while moving and bagging soil and sand products, were exposed to silica. The employer did not provide training concerning the hazards of silica for employees working with the silica containing products on the site. On or about August 2, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i):     Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:      a) Spec Processing Group (Fertl Soil): Employees, (Soil Workers) while moving and bagging silica containing soil and sand, were voluntarily permitted to wear a Moldex 2300 N95 filtering facepiece respirator while handling the silica containing products. On or about August 2, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335637187.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.