OSHA Inspection: BRIAN LAMBEA

Issued

Sep 17, 2012

Abate by

Oct 9, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included at least the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Construction Reference: 1926.59)       Location: Central Ave in Hartsdale, NY    a) The employer did not develop a written hazard  communication program  where employees are exposed to a corrosive and abrasive dust (Portland Cement); on or about August 9, 2012.

Issued

Sep 17, 2012

Abate by

Oct 9, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):     The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)      Location: Central Ave in Hartsdale, NY    a) The employer did not maintain a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical used in the worksite such as but not limited to, "Latex Modified Stucco Base Coat"; on or about August 9, 2012.

Issued

Sep 17, 2012

Abate by

Oct 9, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    Location: Central Ave in Hartsdale, NY    a) The employer did not inform amd train employees on the handling and use of hazardous chemicals used in the worksite such as but not limited to, "Latex Modified Stucco Base Coat"; on or about August 9, 2012.

Issued

Sep 17, 2012

Abate by

Oct 1, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.50(g):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    Location: Central Ave in Hartsdale, NY      a) The employer did not ensure the employees wear safety glasses when exposed to particles when cutting bricks and mixing Latex Modified Stucco; on or about August 9, 2012.

Issued

Sep 17, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    LOCATION: Central Ave in Hartsdale, NY    a) The employer did not ensure the employees wear safety glasses when exposed to particles; on or about August 9, 2012.