MAYVILLE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: HOME IMPROVEMENTS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HOME IMPROVEMENTS in 905 N. HENNININGER, MAYVILLE, WI 53050 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 335666590.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOME IMPROVEMENTS
- Site address
- 905 N. HENNININGER
- City
- MAYVILLE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53050
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 133, REESEVILLE, WI 53579
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. Employer did not provide documentation as to the completion of training on fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means. Employees were not protected from electric shock while installing shingles on a roof less than 10 feet from an energized electric power circuit.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. Employees engaged in roofing activities on a residential roof were not protected from falling to lower levels.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Employees engaged in roofing activities were not trained on the fall hazards associated with roofing.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Home Improvements
View Home Improvements's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335666590.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.