MAINEVILLE, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: KEVIN BROWN
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of KEVIN BROWN in 2952 MOSSY BRINK RD., MAINEVILLE, OH 45039 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335682381.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KEVIN BROWN
- Site address
- 2952 MOSSY BRINK RD.
- City
- MAINEVILLE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45039
- Mailing
- 1108 E. MAPLE ST., MIAMISBURG, OH 45342
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person . a) The employer did not ensure that designated competent person onsite performed a jobsite inspection and address the fall hazard potentials from a two story residential roof shingles being torn off and replaced.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502. a) The employer did not provided conventional or person fall protection for the employees engaged in a re-roof project on a two story residential home that had a roof pitch of 3 in 12 and at height great than 18 feet to the lower ground level.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Kevin Brown
View Kevin Brown's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335682381.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.