BINGHAMTON, NY —
OSHA Inspection: INTERSTATE REINFORCING, INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of INTERSTATE REINFORCING, INC in ROUTE 17 AND INTERSTATE 81 INTERCHANGE OVER CHENANGO RIVER, BINGHAMTON, NY 13901 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 335685780.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INTERSTATE REINFORCING, INC
- Site address
- ROUTE 17 AND INTERSTATE 81 INTERCHANGE OVER CHENANGO RIVER
- City
- BINGHAMTON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13901
- Mailing
- 127 BLIND RD, MEXICO, NY 13114
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A harness with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: a) At the jobsite, on or about 8/8/12: An employee using the basket as a means of conveyance from the ground to the scaffold did not have the harness attached to the basket with a laynard.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $3000
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a) At the jobsite, on or about 8/8/12: An employee walking the top of the rebar cage was exposed to falls of 9 feet to grade.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $3000
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.502 D16 II
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(ii): Personal fall arrest system, when used for fall protection did not limit maximum arresting force on an employee to 1,800 pounds (8 kN) when used with a body harness: a) At the jobsite, on or about 8/22/12: The personal fall arrest system being used by the employee walking the rebar cage did not limit the arresting force to less than 1,800 lbs in that the harness was not worn properly and the anchorage was located at the employees feet allowing for a free fall of more than 6 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $3000
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms: a) At the jobsite, on or about 8/8/17: A section of guardrail was missing from the southwest end of the scaffolding system.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $3000
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.453 B02 IV
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket, were sitting or climbing on the edge of the basket, or were using planks, ladders, or other devices for a work position: a) At the jobsite, on or about 8/8/12: An employee used the rails of the basket to access the work area.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1000
- — C (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.453 B02 VI
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(vi): Boom and basket load limits specified by the manufacturer were exceeded: a) At the jobsite, on or about 8/8/12: Four employees were using the boom lift as a means of conveyance from the ground to the work area at the same time. The basket of the lift is only rated for 3 people.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $1,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: a) At the jobsite, on or about 8/8/12: An employee was utiziling a fall protection system that did not limit free fall to 6 feet or less. The anchorage point was at the employees feet with a 6-ft lanyard.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $1000
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body belt was not located in the center of the wearer's back a) At the jobsite, on or about 8/8/12: An employee utilizing a PFAS was wearing a harness incorrectly and the attachement point was not in the middle of the employees back.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: a) At the jobsite, on or about 8/8/12: An employee was standing on the top step of a step ladder.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $2000
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Interstate Reinforcing, INC
View Interstate Reinforcing, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335685780.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.