BRANFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: SUPERIOR REMODELING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SUPERIOR REMODELING LLC in 256 MONTOYA DRIVE, BUILDING #26, UNITS #50-#52, BRANFORD, CT 06405 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335687794.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUPERIOR REMODELING LLC
- Site address
- 256 MONTOYA DRIVE, BUILDING #26, UNITS #50-#52
- City
- BRANFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06405
- Mailing
- 89 CHIMNEY ROAD, WATERTOWN, CT 06795
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where a portable ladders was used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a ridgid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist emmployees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. Location: Jobsite, 256 Montoya Drive, Building 26, Units #50-#52, Branford, CT 06405 A) The base section of the Werner 24 foot Type I, model D1324-2, aluminum extension ladder did not extend at least three feet above the eave of the roof or upper landing surface of the roof. B) The fly section of the Werner 24 foot Type I, model D1324-2, aluminum extension ladder did not extend at least three feet above the eave of the roof or upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: Location: 256 Montoya Drive, Building #26, Units #50-#52, Branford, CT 06405 The Werner 24 foot, type I, model D1324-2, aluminum extension ladder's base and fly sections were used separately to gain access to the 10 in 12 pitched residential roof with an 8 foot 10 inch eave to ground fall distance.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, that enabled each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and that trained each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize those hazards: Location: 256 Montoya Drive, Building #26, Units #50-#52, Branford, CT 06405 Each employee using portable ladders to access and exit roof areas and locations were not provided with a training program to instruct each employee to recogize hazards assocaited with portable ladders and the means/procedures to minimize or eliminate those hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,160 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Location: 256 Montoya Drive, Building #26, Units #50-#52, Branford, CT Each employee working on the 10 in 12 pitched residential roof with an 8 foot 10 inch eave to ground fall distance from the main roof and a 17 foot fall from the elevated dormer roof to the ground were not protected from falling by the use of a fall protection system. REPEAT STATEMENT Superior Remodeling LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315809178, Citation number 01, item number 001a, issued on October 18, 2011, with respect to a workplace located at 36 Center Street, Prospect, CT 06712 and became a final order on November 14, 2011.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $4000
- · Z (R) $6160
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Location: 256 Montoya Drive, Building #26, Units #50-#52 Each employee exposed to falls from elevation (i.e. roof locations) were not provided with a training program to instruct each employee in the recognition of fall hazards and the means to minimize or eliminate fall hazards. REPEAT STATEMENT Superior Remodeling LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315809178, Citation number 01, item number 001b, issued on October 18, 2011, with respect to a workplace located at 36 Center Street, Prospect, CT 06712 and became a final order on November 14, 2011.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $0
- · Z (R) $0
More inspections at Superior Remodeling LLC
View Superior Remodeling LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335687794.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.