NORWALK, CT —
OSHA Inspection: RICK'S MAIN ROOFING LTD.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RICK'S MAIN ROOFING LTD. in 1 REGENT STREET, NORWALK, CT 06855 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335692190.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICK'S MAIN ROOFING LTD.
- Site address
- 1 REGENT STREET
- City
- NORWALK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06855
- Mailing
- 26 FITCH STREET, NORWALK, CT 06855
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Jobsite: The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program in place for employees who were required to wear half-face respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $952
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Jobsite: The employer did not have employees who were required to wear a respirator go through a medical evaluation prior to wearing the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference 1926.103) Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that employees were given and passed either a qualitative or quantitative fit test for those employees required to wear a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: (Construction Reference 1926.103) Jobsite: The employer did not provide employees who were required to wear a respirator with comprehensive, understandable training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Jobsite: Employees performing roofing work on a flat roof, with approximate heights of up to10 feet from edge to ground, were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $1700
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) Jobsite: Employees required to perform roofing work not receive appropriate training by a competent person who was qualified in knowledge and implementation of OSHA roofing safety requirements to allow employees to understand the hazards associated with roofing work and to take steps to mitigate those hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Rick'S Main Roofing LTD.
View Rick'S Main Roofing LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335692190.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.