Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SIMS METAL MANAGEMENT

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SIMS METAL MANAGEMENT in M/V NEMTAS-2 BERTH#3, REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 (NAICS 488320). OSHA activity number 335725404.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sims Metal Management for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sims Metal Management is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
M/V NEMTAS-2 BERTH#3
City
REDWOOD CITY
State
CA
ZIP
94063
Mailing
699 SEAPOINT BLVD., REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488320
Employees
52
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1918.22 E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1918.22(e): The employer did not provide a net or other suitable protection where the gangway overhung the water so that there was danger of employees falling between the ship and the dock.      a)  M/V NEMTAS-2, portside accomodation ladder:  The employer did not provide a net or other protection when there was danger of an employee falling between the ship and the dock. There was a three foot gap between the dock and the ladder which was not covered by the net.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1918.22 F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1918.22(f): The space between the foot of the gangway and the apron was more than 1 foot (0.30m), and was not bridged by a firm walkway equipped with a hand rail (with a minimum height of approximately 33 inches (0.84m)) with midrails on both sides:       a)  M/V NEMTAS-2, portside accommodation ladder:  The space between the dock and the gangway was more than one foot and the employer did not provide firm walkway equipped with a handrail with a minimum height of approximately 33 inches in height with midrails on both sides. There was a three foot gap between the dock and the ladder which exposed the employee to a fall into the water.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1918.97 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1918.97(d)(1): For each vessel being worked, there was not at least one Stokes basket stretcher, or its equivalent, available to be permanently equipped with bridles for attachment to the hoisting gear:        a)  M/V NEMTAS-2, portside main deck:  An employee was working onboard the vessel and the employer did not have a Stokes basket stretcher, or its equivalent, available to be permanently equipped with bridles for attachment to the hoisting gear.       .
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $3000

1918.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2012
Abate by
Dec 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1918.100(a): An employer did not develop or implement an emergency action plan:       a)  M/V NEMTAS-2, portside main deck:  An employee was working onboard the vessel and the employer had not developed an emergency action plan that covers actions the employer and employees must take to ensure employee safety from fire or other emergencies.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Sims Metal Management's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335725404.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.