Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: OLSON TOON LANDSCAPING INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of OLSON TOON LANDSCAPING INC. in 3153 MAPLE GROVE DRIVE, MADISON, WI 53719 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 335739397.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Olson Toon Landscaping INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Olson Toon Landscaping INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3153 MAPLE GROVE DRIVE
City
MADISON
State
WI
ZIP
53719
Mailing
4387 SCHWARTZ RD., MIDDLETON, WI 53562
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
65
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2012
Abate by
Nov 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):   The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable:    The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program where employees are required to wear respiratory protection when cutting on concrete.    Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):   The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    A medical evaluation was not provided where employee(s) are required to wear half face respirators.    Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):   Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    Respirator fit testing was not provided for employee(s) who are required to wear half face respirators.    Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k):   The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable respiratory protection training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  (Construction Reference 1926.103)    Respiratory protection training was not provided for employee(s) required to wear half face respirators.    Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):   Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    An employee who was performing dry cutting on concrete was not provided information on the health hazards associated with exposure to silica dust.    Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2012
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii):   The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace:    Where employees were dry cutting on concrete, the employer had not performed representative sampling to determine employee exposure to respirable silica.    Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Olson Toon Landscaping INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335739397.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.