MOBILE, AL ·
OSHA Inspection: RUDY FIELDS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RUDY FIELDS in 5460 RANGELINE RD, MOBILE, AL 36619 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 335740585.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RUDY FIELDS
- Site address
- 5460 RANGELINE RD
- City
- MOBILE
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36619
- Mailing
- 4224 MIMOSA DR, MOSS POINT, MS 39562
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a) On or about August 15, 2012 and times prior at 5460 Range line Rd, Mobile, Al: The employer failed to ensure the top working level on a fabricated frame scaffold was fully planked or decked while performing bricklaying operations which exposed employees to hazards associated with falls of 25 feet 5 inches to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: a) On or about August 15, 2012 and times prior scaffold poles/legs: The employer failed to ensure the fabricated frame scaffold poles/legs were fitted with base plates to prevent punch through or slippage.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless the entire platform is attached to the fork and the fork-lift is not moved horizontally while the platform is occupied: a) On or about August 15, 2012 and times prior at 5460 Range line Rd, Mobile, Al: The employer failed to ensure an employee did not use a fork lift with a pallet on the forks and raised up to the 3rd buck level to stand on while off-loading bricks from the pallet (platform) which exposed him to fall hazards of 15 feet 5 inches.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used and to understand the procedures to control them: a) On or about August 15, 2012 at 5460 Rangeline Rd, Mobile, Al: The employer failed to ensure an employee working from a pallet raised by a forklift was trained on the hazards associated with working from scaffolds and the procedures to control them.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a) On or about August 15, 2012 and times prior at 5460 Range line Rd, Mobile, Al: The employer failed to ensure fall protection was provided for employees laying brick on the 5th buck level and an employee on the 4th buck level handing up brick which exposed employees to the hazards associated with falls of 25 feet 5 inches and 20 feet 5 inches to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 H01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with head protection from falling objects from above: a) On or about August 15, 2012 and times prior at 5460 Range line Rd, Mobile, Al: The employer failed to ensure that employees were protected to employees on upper levels from falling bricks as they passed bricks from the 3rd to 4th levels and 4th to 5th levels due to hardhats not being worn.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335740585.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.