Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LAUTERBACH GROUP, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LAUTERBACH GROUP, INC. in W222 N5710 MILLER WAY, SUSSEX, WI 53089 (NAICS 322299). OSHA activity number 335743787.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lauterbach Group, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lauterbach Group, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
W222 N5710 MILLER WAY
City
SUSSEX
State
WI
ZIP
53089
Mailing
W222 N5710 MILLER WAY, SUSSEX, WI 53089
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322299
Employees
47
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,975
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts and in-running nip points:      (a)  In the press department, the sheeter table for Presses #215 and #216 had unguarded in-running nip points from unguarded stacker belts. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards approximately 41 inches from the floor.     (b)  In the press department, the fan folder adjacent to Press #225 had unguarded rotating parts where stock was folded. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards approximately 53 inches from the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3):     Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    (a)  In the press department, the fan folder adjacent to Press #225 had an unguarded chain and sprocket approximately 45 inches off the floor. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i):     Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    (a)  In the press department, the waste rewind shaft on Press #215 was unguarded and projected more than half the diameter. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards.     (b) In the press department, the waste rewind shaft on Press #216 was unguarded and projected more than half the diameter. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards.     (c)  In the press department, the rewind roll shaft at the end of Press #216 was unguarded and projected more than half the diameter. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):     Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:    (a) In the maintenance area, the workrest for the Allied pedestal grinder was not adjusted so it would provide protection for employees performing grinding activities. Employees were exposed to entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.242 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $890 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b):     Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    (a) In the maintenance area, compressed air for the vertical mill was expelling at approximately 70 p.s.i. Employees were exposed to an embolism hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $890
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i):     Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:    (a)  The employer did not provide employee(s) a copy of Appendix D of the Respiratory Protection Standard prior to using a voluntary-use filtering face piece respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 B01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1):     Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that the employer did not ensure the safety of the equipment pursuant to the considerations in sections (i) through (viii) of 29 CR 1910.303(b)(1):    (a)  In the press department, Press #206 had two energized metallic utility boxes with a grounding prong broken off in each. Employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1030 C01 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i):     The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    (a)  At the Sussex, Wisconsin production facility, the employer did not develop and implement an Exposure Control Plan for employees designated as first responders and/or individuals who could come into contact with bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Lauterbach Group, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335743787.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.