Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VINCENTIAN DE MARILLAC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of VINCENTIAN DE MARILLAC in 5300 STANTON AVENUE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15206 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 335753786.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vincentian DE Marillac — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vincentian DE Marillac is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5300 STANTON AVENUE
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15206
Mailing
5300 STANTON AVENUE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15206
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
89
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 59 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv):  The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure:      a) Facility, on or about August 1, 2012 - The ECP program titled "Exposure Control Plan/Bloodborne Pathogens," was not reviewed and updated at least annually to reflect procedures which affect occupational exposures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.1030 G02 VII D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 59 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(D): The employer did not ensure the training program included an explanation of the employer's exposure control plan and the means by which the employee can obtain a copy of the written plan:      a) Facility, on or about August 1, 2012 - The employer did not ensure the training program included an explanation of the employers exposure control plan and policy titled "Exposure Control Plan/Bloodborne Pathogens," and the means by which the employees can obtain a copy of the written plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D04 III A2III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(iii):  During use, containers for contaminated sharps were not replaced routinely and were allowed to overfill:    a) 1st Floor, Medicine Cart, on or about August 1, 2012 - The sharps container stored on the medicine cart was overfilled with injection needle sharp devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.1200 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):  Employers shall have a material safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:    a) In the Laundry room, on or about September 5, 2012 - The employer did not maintain MSDS sheets for Morning Mist, a corrosive, which contained ethyl alcohol and didocyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, and an industrial strength laundry bleach which contained 35% hydrogen peroxide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Jan 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii):  Appropriate hazard warnings, or alternatively, words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provided at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals was not attached to hazardous chemicals:     a) In the Laundry room, on or about September 5, 2012 -  The spray bottle of Morning Mist, which contained ethyl alcohol and didocyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, was not labeled with hazardous warnings such as corrosive.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):  The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not inlcude an explanation of the labeling system and the material safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    a) In the Laundry room, on or about September 5, 2012 -  The maintenance employees were not trained on the details of the hazard communication program including an explanation of the material safety data sheets and where the copies of the material safety data sheets were located.     Maintenance employees were responsible for changing out the empty containers such as but not limited to the following laundry detergents:  NDT Oxy-Bleach, which contained hydrogen peroxide; laundry bleach, which contained 35% hydrogen peroxide; Power Jolt, which contained sodium hydroxide; and Citri-D, which contained sodium hydroxide and 2-butoxyethanol.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:     a) In the Laundry room, on or about September 5, 2012 -  The employer did not verify a written hazard assessment had been performed to identify personal protective devices including, but not limited to, safety glasses and chemical protective gloves that maintenance employees were required to use during replacing of laundry detergent solutions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Vincentian DE Marillac's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335753786.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.