Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: FLAVIANO TOVAR ROOFING

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FLAVIANO TOVAR ROOFING in 3224 FEE FEE RD., BRIDGETON, MO 63044 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335773784.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flaviano Tovar Roofing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flaviano Tovar Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3224 FEE FEE RD.
City
BRIDGETON
State
MO
ZIP
63044
Mailing
775 WIGGENS FERRY DR., APT. #A, CREVE COEUR, MO 63141
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2012
Abate by
Sep 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2)  The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    1)  At the job site, exposed employees were unable to recognize the following hazards:       a)  Working within 10 feet of a live, overhead power line       b)  Using an orange flexible extension cord that was inot designed for hard or extra-hard usage       c)  Using a yellow flexible extension cord whose path to ground was not continuous
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2012
Abate by
Sep 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6)  The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    1) At the jobsite, the yellow flexible cord used to power the Dewalt circular saw was not equipped with a grounding pin.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.405 A02 II J

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2012
Abate by
Sep 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J)  Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances were not designed for hard or extra-hard usage:    1)  At the jobsite, the orange flexible cord used to power a blower was not designed for hard or extra-hard usage.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2012
Abate by
Sep 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1)  Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:    1)  At the jobsite, employees were removing preexisting roofing material on a residential roof adjacent to a live overhead power line.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor  did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    1)  At the jobsite employees removing preexisting roofing material from a residential roof were not wearing or using any form of conventional fall protection.  The roof's slope was approximately 24 degrees from the horizontal or 5:12.  The ground to eave height over the front door was measured at approx. 9 ft.  The ground to eave height at the rear of the house was approximately 15 ft.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)  Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    1)  At the jobsite the side rails belonging to a portable ladder used by employees to gain access to and egress from the residential roof were approximately 1 foot above the rake.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335773784.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.