COLBERT, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: WELDCO MANUFACTURING, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WELDCO MANUFACTURING, LLC in 350 S. FRANKLIN STREET, COLBERT, OK 74733 (NAICS 333120). OSHA activity number 335791380.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WELDCO MANUFACTURING, LLC
- Site address
- 350 S. FRANKLIN STREET
- City
- COLBERT
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74733
- Mailing
- 350 S. FRANKLIN STREET, COLBERT, OK 74733
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333120
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about August 15, 2012, and at times prior thereto at the facility in three instances the employer allowed employees to operate various machines without a guard provided: 1: In the machine shop a CNC lathe was used without an interlock device provided to prevent employee contacting the chuck when the door is opened while in operation. 2: At the press brake area a press brake was used without guard provided. 3: At the shear area a guard was provided for the shear however the openings of the guard were big enough to allow employees hands or fingers to enter the point-of-operation while in operation. Employees were exposed to an amputation caused by the unguarded point-of operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $850
- · Z (S) $1700
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: On or about August 15, 2012, and at times prior thereto in the machine shop employees were allowed to operate an abrasive wheel grinding machine which did not have a work rest provided. Employees were exposed to flying fragments in the event of an exploding wheel.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $680
- · Z (S) $1360
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: On or about August 15, 2012, and at times prior thereto in the machine shop employees were allowed to operate an abrasive wheel grinding machine which did not have a tongue guard provided. Employees were exposed to flying fragments in the event of an exploding wheel.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.215 D03
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(d)(3): The contact surface(s) of wheel(s), blotter(s) or flange(s) on grinding machine(s) were not flat and free or foreign matter: On or about August 15, 2012, and at times prior thereto in the machine shop area the employer allowed employees to operate abrasive wheel grinding machines that had the abrasive wheels worn unevenly. The employees were exposed to flying fragments in the event of exploding wheels.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $510 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: On or about August 15, 2012, and at times prior thereto, in the shop areas employee were allowed to use compressed air nozzles for cleaning purpose which were not the type that would reduce the pressure to below 30 psi. The employees were exposed to skin and eye injury.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $510
- · Z (S) $1020
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": On or about August 15, 2012, and at times prior thereto, in the shop areas fire exit doors were found not clearly marked by a sign reading "Exit". Employees were exposed to possible fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333120)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335791380.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.