Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: SUPREME ROOFING PRODUCTS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SUPREME ROOFING PRODUCTS, INC. in 2705 SOUTHSIDE DRIVE, TUSCALOOSA, AL 35401 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 335796983.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Supreme Roofing Products, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Supreme Roofing Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2705 SOUTHSIDE DRIVE
City
TUSCALOOSA
State
AL
ZIP
35401
Mailing
2705 SOUTHSIDE DRIVE, TUSCALOOSA, AL 35401
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2012
Abate by
Feb 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      (a)  On or about 8/13/12 - Throughout the Facility, a written hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented for employees working with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to Coastal Hydraulic Fluid and ZEP 45 NC Lubricant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:        (a) On or about 8/13/12 - Shop Area, an exit was blocked by a Ridge former machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2):  Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":        (a) On or about 8/13/12 - Shop Area, an exit was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2012
Abate by
Dec 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):      (a) On or about 8/13/12 - Shop Area, a Kalmar AC forklift had an inoperable horn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:      (a) On or about 8/12/12 - Vinyl Siding Warehouse, a Schlebach Quadro+ standing seam machine was missing a cover plate.      (b) On or about 8/12/12 - Shop Area, a hydraulic coiler had a chain and sprocket that were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2012
Abate by
Feb 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:      (a) On or about 8/13/12 - Throughout the Facility, no written certification to verify the hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335796983.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.