Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: DALLAS CABINET MAN

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DALLAS CABINET MAN in 2714 WEST KINGSLEY ROAD, SUITE 3G, GARLAND, TX 75041 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 335797411.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dallas Cabinet MAN for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dallas Cabinet MAN is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DALLAS CABINET MAN
Site address
2714 WEST KINGSLEY ROAD, SUITE 3G
City
GARLAND
State
TX
ZIP
75041
Mailing
2714 WEST KINGSLEY ROAD, SUITE 3G, GARLAND, TX 75041
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures:    This violation occurred on August 15, 2012 and at times prior thereto, in the cabinet manufacturing facility, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees wearing respirators to perform spraying operations in the facility.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $640
  • · C (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious 31 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    This violation occurred on August 15, 2012 and at times prior thereto, in the cabinet manufacturing facility, the employer did not provide medical evaluation for employees required to use respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01 I

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(i): Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee were not cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition:    This violation occurred on August 15, 2012 and times prior thereto, in the spray area of the cabinet manufacturing facility, employees used 3M full face respiratiors that were not maintained in a sanitary condition.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:                                                                                                                This violation occurred on August 15, 2012 and at times prior thereto, in the cabinet manufacturing facility, employees operated a Wilton 5/8 chuck 12 speed drill press serial #207457 with no guard over rotating parts.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $640
  • · C (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.213 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1):  Each circular crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an Automatically adjusting hood which completely enclose that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:                                                                                                                This violation occurred on August 15, 2012 and at times prior thereto, in the cabinet manufacturing facility, employees operated a Grizzly table saw serial #082402, model G0606X with no guard over rotating blade above the table.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1120
  • · C (S) $2800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each work place, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning:        This violation occurred on August 15, 2012 and at times prior thereto, in the cabinet manufacturing facility, the employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program was available at the workplace.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $640
  • · C (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335797411.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.