ROSENBERG, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BUTLER WADDEL INTEREST
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BUTLER WADDEL INTEREST in 1900 AVENUE G, ROSENBERG, TX 77471 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335818209.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BUTLER WADDEL INTEREST
- Site address
- 1900 AVENUE G
- City
- ROSENBERG
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77471
- Mailing
- 821 3RD STREET, ROSENBERG, TX 77471
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and fuardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: At the worksite, on August 17, 2012, employees were cleaning and reparing the damaged roof. The employees were not protected against falls of approximately 18 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: At the worksite, on August 17, 2012, employees were cleaning and repairing the roof of the office building. The employees had not recieved fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335818209.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.