Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ABSOLUTE GRANITE AND STONE

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of ABSOLUTE GRANITE AND STONE in 340 COX RD. SU #4, COCOA, FL 32926 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 335823985.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Absolute Granite and Stone — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Absolute Granite and Stone is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
340 COX RD. SU #4
City
COCOA
State
FL
ZIP
32926
Mailing
340 COX RD. SU #4, COCOA, FL 32926
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423320
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $660 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2):     Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":    a) In the office area the exit door was not marked, exposing employees to a fire hazard, on or about August 17 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $660
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.178 O01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(o)(1):     The employer did not ensure that only stable or safely arranged loads were handled:    a) In that the employer did not ensure that the trucking company employee who was attaching the pressure clamp was outside of the hazard zone (fall shadow) of a granite slab before moving the lifting equipment to securely engage the pressure clamp, as noted on or about August 17, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) At the facility - the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for chemical products such as, but not limited to, Sakrete Leak Stopper, exposing employees to a contact hazard, on or about August 17, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1040
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):     The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:      a) at the facility - the employer did not have material safety data sheets for chemical products, such as but not limited to, Sakrete Leak Stopper, exposing employees to a contact hazard, on or about August 17, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employers did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area and chemical-specific information was not always available through labels and material safety data sheets    a) At the facility - The employer did not provide hazard communication training for materials such as, but not limited to, Sakrete Leak Stopper, exposing employees to a contact hazard, on or about August 17, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2013
Abate by
Mar 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4):     Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:    (a) A yellow Yale forklift s/n E187 VO8874 W, model GLC050RUGUAQ088 - a boom attachment was added the forklift for lifting granite slabs, on or about August 17, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335823985.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.