Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HERMAN DAMAS ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HERMAN DAMAS ROOFING in 246 FERGUSON AVE, TALLMADGE, OH 44278 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335837589.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Herman Damas Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Herman Damas Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
246 FERGUSON AVE
City
TALLMADGE
State
OH
ZIP
44278
Mailing
1150 DAYTON ST, AKRON, OH 44310
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $510 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:       On or about August 20, 2012, the employer failed to ensure employees wore proper eye/face protection while attaching shingles to a roof using a pneumatic nail gun.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $510
  • — Z (S) $1020

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b):    On or about August 20, 2012, the employer failed to ensure employees working from a 4/12 pitch roof were protected from a fall of approximately 17 feet 4 inches by using an adequate fall protective system/devices. Employees were performing tear off and replacement of weatherproofing from a residential roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $850
  • — Z (S) $1700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335837589.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.