Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BVM CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BVM CORPORATION in 430 S. NAVAJO ST., DENVER, CO 80223 (NAICS 333132). OSHA activity number 335857983.

Watch BVM Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BVM Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BVM CORPORATION
Site address
430 S. NAVAJO ST.
City
DENVER
State
CO
ZIP
80223
Mailing
430 S. NAVAJO ST., DENVER, CO 80223
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333132
Employees
56
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2975.00 · Current $1785.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating machinery:    BVM Corporation, at 430 S Navajo Street, Denver, CO:  On and preceding 8/21/12, BVM Corporation did not ensure that machine guarding was provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating machinery.  One employee operated a Fosdick Machine Tool Co drill press while fabricating carbon steel parts.  The rotating chuck and head of the drill press were not guarded.  The employee worked in close proximity to the rotating parts while adding cutting fluid and monitoring the work.  The employer did not ensure that a machine guard protected the employee from the rotating chuck and head of the drill press.  This condition exposed the employee to a laceration hazard.    BVM Corporation, at 430 S Navajo Street, Denver, CO:  On and preceding 8/21/12, BVM Corporation did not ensure that machine guarding was provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating machinery.  One employee operated an American drill press while fabricating carbon steel parts.  The rotating chuck and head of the drill press were not guarded.  The employee worked in close proximity to the rotating parts while adding cutting fluid and monitoring the work.  The employer did not ensure that a machine guard protected the employee from the rotating chuck and head of the drill press.  This condition exposed the employee to a laceration hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 41 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):    BVM Corporation, at 430 S Navajo Street, Denver, CO:  On and preceding 8/21/12, BVM Corporation did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2).  Employees performed tasks at a metal tool manufacturing facility.  Employees during the course of their duties were exposed to flying particulates, noise, intense light, and respiratory hazards.  The employer had not performed a written certification of the workplace hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain a written respiratory protection program, as specified in subparagraphs (c)(1)(i) through (ix), in that employees were required to wear respirators during work operations:    BVM Corporation, at 430 S Navajo Street, Denver, CO:  On and preceding 8/21/12, BVM Corporation did not establish and maintain a written respiratory protection program, as specified in subparagraphs (c)(1)(i) through (ix), in that employees were required to wear respirators during work operations.   One employee spraypainted fabricated metal parts in a spraypaint booth.  The employee was required to wear a 3M 8210 N95 filtering facepiece respirator when using compressed air to clean parts and a 3M 6001 tight fitting air purifying half mask respirator with organic vapor cartridges and  prefilters when spraypainting.  The employer did not establish or maintain a written respiratory protection program.  This condition potentially exposed the employee to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested, or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    BVM Corporation, at 430 S Navajo Street, Denver, CO:  On and preceding 8/21/12, BVM Corporation did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested, or required to use the respirator in the workplace.   One employee spraypainted fabricated metal parts in a spraypaint booth.  The employee was required to wear a 3M 8210 N95 filtering facepiece respirator when using compressed air to clean parts and a 3M 6001 tight fitting air purifying half mask respirator with organic vapor cartridges and  prefilters when spraypainting.  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.  This condition potentially exposed the employee to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):  Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:    BVM Corporation, at 430 S Navajo Street, Denver, CO:  On and preceding 8/21/12, BVM Corporation permitted respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function.  One employee spraypainted fabricated metal parts in a spraypaint booth.  The employee was required to wear a 3M 8210 N95 filtering facepiece respirator when using compressed air to clean parts and a 3M 6001 tight fitting air purifying half mask respirator with organic vapor cartridges and  prefilters when spraypainting.  The employer did not ensure that the employee had no facial hair that came between the seal of the facepiece and the employee's face.  This condition potentially exposed the employee to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, annual respirator training to employees who are required to use respirators:    BVM Corporation, at 430 S Navajo Street, Denver, CO:  On and preceding 8/21/12, BVM Corporation did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, annual respirator training to employees who are required to use respirators.  One employee spraypainted fabricated metal parts in a spraypaint booth.  The employee was required to wear a 3M 8210 N95 filtering facepiece respirator when using compressed air to clean parts and a 3M 6001 tight fitting air purifying half mask respirator with organic vapor cartridges and  prefilters when spraypainting.  The employer did not provide comprehensive, annual respirator training to the employee.  This condition potentially exposed the employee to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View BVM CORPORATION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335857983.