Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRENCH MILL STONE, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FRENCH MILL STONE, INC. in 14325 MOORESVILLE ROAD, ATHENS, AL 35613 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 335889580.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch French Mill Stone, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for French Mill Stone, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
14325 MOORESVILLE ROAD
City
ATHENS
State
AL
ZIP
35613
Mailing
14325 MOORESVILLE ROAD, ATHENS, AL 35613
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8-hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 15 milligrams per cubic meters (mg/m3):      (a) On or about August 22, 2012 - Lathe operator/Stone Finisher, an employee was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average of 33.7 mg/m3 of Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (Total Dust), 2.25 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 15 mg/m3. The sampling time was 414 minutes during one shift on August 23, 2012.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time of 66 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):      (a) On or about August 22, 2012 - Lathe Operator/Stone Finisher, an employee was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average of 33.7 mg/m3 of Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (Total Dust), 2.25 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 15 mg/m3. The sampling time was 414 minutes during one shift on August 23, 2012. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time of 66 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Nov 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses eye protection that provides side protection when there is a hazard from flying objects:      (a) On or about August 22, 2012 - Lathe Operator/Stone Finisher, an employee using a pneumatic tool to smooth limestone wore prescription glasses without the side protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Nov 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      (a) On or about August 22, 2012 - Facility, a written hazard communication program was not developed or implemented for employees working with hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to, limestone, propane, and lubricating oils.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:      (a) On or about August 22, 2012 - Rockford Planner, lubricating oil was found in an unlabeled container.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335889580.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.