Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JAIME CORRA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JAIME CORRA in 5480 VISTA BROOK DRIVE, SUWANEE, GA 30024 (NAICS 444190). OSHA activity number 335902383.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jaime Corra — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jaime Corra is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JAIME CORRA
Site address
5480 VISTA BROOK DRIVE
City
SUWANEE
State
GA
ZIP
30024
Mailing
914 AVEBURY DRIVE, ATLANTA, GA 30344
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
444190
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Three employees that were chipping bricks with trowels were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights is no    On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Employees performing brick masonry work from a tubular welded frame scaffold that was approximately 5-feet wide, 35-feet long, and greater than 25-feet high were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 24-feet when the work platform of the scaffold was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 B07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(7): On scaffolds where platforms are overlapped to create a long platform, the overlap was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) and the platforms were not nailed together or otherwise restrained to prevent movement:    On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Employees performing brick masonry work from a tubular welded frame scaffold that was approximately 5-feet wide, 35-feet long, and greater than 25-feet high were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 24-feet when the planks of the work level of the scaffold were overlapped less than 12 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(i): Guys, ties, and braces were not installed at locations where horixontal members support both inner and outer legs.    On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Employees performing brick masonry work from a tubular welded frame scaffold that was approximately 5-feet wide, 35-feet long, and greater than 25-feet high were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 24-feet when the scaffold was not secured to the house.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.     On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Employees performing brick masonry work from a tubular welded frame scaffold that was approximately 5-feet wide, 35-feet long, and greater than 25-feet high were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 24-feet when the employees had to climb the frame of the scaffold to access and egress the work platform because the employer did not install a ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.    On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Employees performing brick masonry work from a tubular welded frame scaffold that was approximately 5-feet wide, 35-feet long, and greater than 25-feet high were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 24-feet when the work platform the employees worked from did not have guard rails and end rails installed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Jan 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Two employees performing brick masonry work were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 24-feet while working from a tubular welded frame scaffold when the employer did not train the employees how to recognize and minimize the hazards associated with working from scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Jan 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    On or ahout August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee. Georgia:    Employees performing brick masonry work using chemicals that include but are not limited to COOSA Type N Masonry Cement which contains silica and Portland cement were exposed to eye, skin, and lung irritation when the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program to inform empoyees how to recognize and minimize chemical hazards they are exposed to on the job.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Employees performing brick masonry work using chemicals which include but are not limited to COOSA Type N Masonry Cement were exposed to eye, skin, and lung irritation when the employer did not maintain material safety data sheets on the jobsite to inform employees how to recognize and minimize chemical hazards on the job.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Jan 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Employees performing brick masonry work using chemicals which include but are not limited to COOSA Type N Masonry cement which contains silica and Portland cement, were exposed to eye, skin, and lung irritation when the employer did not train the employees how to recognize and minimize chemcial hazards they are exposed to on the job.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Jan 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    On or about August 21, 2012, at 5480 Vista Brook Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    An employee performing brick masonry work was exposed to lung irritation while mixing COOSA Type N Masonry cement which contains silica and Portland cement when the employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program to inform employees required to wear respirators how to recognize and minimize respiratory hazards on the job.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335902383.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.