Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DLJ COMMERCIAL ROOFING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DLJ COMMERCIAL ROOFING, LLC in 1900 N EXPRESSWAY SUITE 0, BROWNSVILLE, TX 78521 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335957981.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DLJ Commercial Roofing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DLJ Commercial Roofing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1900 N EXPRESSWAY SUITE 0
City
BROWNSVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
78521
Mailing
6805 E. STATE HWY 107, EDINBURG, TX 78542
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Abate by
Feb 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103    At this job site, the employer did not implement a written respiratory program for employees wearing a Model Number 3M 8511 NIOSH TC-84A-1299-N95 and 3M half face respirator and L83 Gaerson half face respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 7 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Abate by
Feb 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a)     At this job site, employees wearing half-face respirators and N95 respirators when applying a white chemical coating onto a roof were not medically evaluated prior to wearing and working with the respirators on.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Abate by
Feb 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):     The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference 1926.103    At this job site, employees required to wear half-face respirators, model number 3M  and L83 Gerson while spraying or rolling on a white chemical adhesive onto the roof, were not fit-tested prior to wearing and applying the white coating while using the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Abate by
Feb 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10):     Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems:    Employees performing roofing work at the rear of the roof of the building undergoing roofing work were not protected against falls from the roof. Employees walking and working near the unprotected sides and edges were not provided with a lifeline to attached the lanyards of the harnesses being worn. No other form of fall protection was in place and in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335957981.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.