Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AMERICAN BOLT CORP.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AMERICAN BOLT CORP. in 16555 W. GLENDALE DRIVE, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151 (NAICS 423710). OSHA activity number 335987624.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch American Bolt Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for American Bolt Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AMERICAN BOLT CORP.
Site address
16555 W. GLENDALE DRIVE
City
NEW BERLIN
State
WI
ZIP
53151
Mailing
16555 W. GLENDALE DRIVE, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423710
Employees
55
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):     The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    (a)  The employer did not develop an energy control program for employees performing maintenance/servicing on equipment, such as but not limited to changing saw blades in the metal-cutting band saws. Employees were exposed to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):     The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:    (a)  The employer did not ensure training on the purpose and function of energy control was performed prior to maintenance/servicing of equipment, such as but not limited to changing blades in the metal-cutting band saws. Employees were exposed to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial vehicle.    (a)  Powered industrial vehicle training did not consist of formal instruction and a certified performance evaluation. Employees were permitted to operate powered industrial vehicles based on a visual observation. Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Oct 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1):     Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    (a) In the warehouse near the sawing area, a cover to a utility box containing energized wires was unprotected and exposing employees to electrical shock hazards approximately 35 inches off the floor.     (b) In the warehouse near the sawing area, an electrical panel was missing a breaker switch exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.23 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1):     Standard railing(s) did not consist of top rail, intermediate rail and/or posts and/or did not have a vertical height of 42 inches (106.7 cm) nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform runway, or ramp level:    (a)  In the warehouse, the storage mezzanine above the storage room had a guardrail that did not consist of a midrail. Employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7):     Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:    (a)  The employer did not ensure powered industrial vehicles were inspected for defects prior to being placed into service each shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Oct 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii):     Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:    (a) In the sawing area of the warehouse, a yellow extension cord powering the Baldor grinder did not have strain relief in that the cord was pulled away from the plug, exposing insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     (a)  The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for chemicals in the workplace, such as but not limited to Lenox Band Ade Sawing Coolant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):     The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical    (a)  The employer did not maintain a copy of the material safety data sheet for Lenox Band Ade Sawing Coolant onsite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a)  The employer did not provide training and information on the chemicals in the workplace, such as but not limited to Band Ade Sawing Coolant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335987624.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.