ARLINGTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: SAUL MARQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SAUL MARQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ in 5411 RUNNYMEDE COURT, ARLINGTON, TX 76016 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 336026984.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SAUL MARQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
- Site address
- 5411 RUNNYMEDE COURT
- City
- ARLINGTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76016
- Mailing
- 2204 BAYBERRY DR., MESQUITE, TX 75149
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.25 A
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form or scrap lumber with protruding nails was not kept clear from work areas: (a) On or about 8/28/12, at the front of the house, scrap lumber and other debris were not kept clear from the work areas, exposing employees to slips, trips, and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: (a) On or about 8/28/12, at the front of the residence, the scaffold that was being used to perform cornice work had not been designed by a qualified person. The employee using this scaffold was exposed to fall hazards of more than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide: (a) On or about 8/28/12, at the front of the residence, an employee was standing on a plank that was not 18 inches wide while performing cornice work. The employee was exposed to falls of more than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: (a) On or about 8/28/12, at the front of the residence, a scaffold ladder was not provided for accessing the scaffold. The employee climbed through a window to access the scaffold and was exposed to fall hazards of more than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: (a) On or about 8/28/12, at the front of the residence, the employee was working from the scaffold platform and was not protected from falling by the use of guardrails or other fall protection systems. The employee was exposed to falls of more than 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336026984.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.