Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SEA WORLD OF TEXAS, LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of SEA WORLD OF TEXAS, LLC in 10500 SEA WORLD DR., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78251 (NAICS 713110). OSHA activity number 336075783.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch SEA World of Texas, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SEA World of Texas, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10500 SEA WORLD DR.
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78251
Mailing
10500 SEA WORLD DR., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78251
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
713110
Employees
2000
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.333 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(2): Where exposed live parts were not deenergized (i.e., for reasons of increased or additional hazards or infeasibility), other safety-related work practices were not used to protect employees who could be exposed to the electrical hazards involved:      On 08/25/12, employees were taking amperage readings on an energized Hastings HVAC 480 V system model number SB-112 and did not use safety-related work practices to avoid accidental contact with live electrical parts exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    On 08/25/12, an employee was taking amperage readings on an energized Hastings HVAC 480 V system model number SB-112 and was not trained in the recognition of electrical safe work practices exposing the employee to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.333 C08

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(8): Conductive articles of jewelry and clothing (such a watch bands, bracelets, rings, key chains, necklaces, metalized aprons, cloth with conductive thread, or metal headgear) were worn where employees might contact exposed energized parts.      a) On 08/25/12, an employee was taking amperage readings on an energized Hastings HVAC 480 V system model number SB-112 while wearing jewelry exposing the employee to electrical hazards.      b) On 08/28/12, a supervisor was demonstrating routine procedures for testing an energized Hastings HVAC 480 V system model number SB-112 by powering off the disconnect and then opening the disconnect cover which was energized to 480 V while wearing a metallic necklace exposing the supervisor to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:      a) On 08/25/12, employees were taking amperage readings on an energized Hastings HVAC 480 V system model number SB-112 without personal protective equipment exposing the employees to electrical hazards.       b) On 08/28/12, a supervisor was demonstrating routine procedures for testing an energized Hastings HVAC 480 V system model number SB-112 by powering off the disconnect and then opening the disconnect cover which was energized to 480 V and without personal protective equipment exposing the superviosr to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.335 A02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(i): When working near exposed energized conductors or circuit parts, each employee did not use insulated tools or handling equipment when the tools or handling equipment might have made contact with such conductors or parts:      On 08/25/12, employees removed panels on an energized Hastings HVAC 480 V system model number SB-112 with non-insulated tools to access energized electrical components to perform amperage readings exposing the employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336075783.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.