WINDSOR, CO —
OSHA Inspection: GARCIA, GUMERCINDO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GARCIA, GUMERCINDO in 2140 CAPE HATTERAS DRIVE, WINDSOR, CO 80550 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 336104195.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GARCIA, GUMERCINDO
- Site address
- 2140 CAPE HATTERAS DRIVE
- City
- WINDSOR
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80550
- Mailing
- 132 - 19TH AVE. CT., GREELEY, CO 80631
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $510 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) Garcia, Gumercindo at 2140 Cape Hatteras Drive, Windsor, CO 80550: On or before September 1, 2012, the employer did not ensure that employees wore safety glasses when using or working in the vicinity of pneumatic nail guns. Condition exposed employees to the hazard of projectiles to the eyes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $510
- — Z (S) $1020
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b). Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502: a) Garcia, Gumercindo at 2140 Cape Hatteras Drive, Windsor, CO 80550: On or before September 1, 2012, the employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when shingling this two-story single family home involving a roof with a 6 in 12 pitch. Condition exposed employees to fall hazards of up to 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850
- — Z (S) $1700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336104195.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.