LAKEWOOD, CO —
OSHA Inspection: CRUZ CUSTOM STUCCO & PLASTERING LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CRUZ CUSTOM STUCCO & PLASTERING LLC in 7777 W. JEWELL, LAKEWOOD, CO 80401 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 336153606.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CRUZ CUSTOM STUCCO & PLASTERING LLC
- Site address
- 7777 W. JEWELL
- City
- LAKEWOOD
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80401
- Mailing
- 11845 W. 13TH AVE., LAKEWOOD, CO 80401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238190
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards which were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing injuries from an extendable boom fork truck: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, an employee was exposed to crushing injuries from an overturn in that, the seat belt provided in the fork truck was not being used by the operator. Among other methods, two feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are to require, and effectively enforce, the use of the seat belt provided for use by the manufacturer, and to adhere to ANSI/ITSDF B56.6-2005, Section 6.2.1, which states: "Before starting to operate the rough terrain forklift truck: (a) be in operating position and fasten seat belt, if so equipped;" (b) On or about September 5, 2012, employees were exposed to crushing injuries from an extendable boom fork truck that was moving containers of stucco on and off a scaffold over the heads of the employees working on an elevated surface and on a scaffold. Among other methods, two feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are to require, and effectively enforce, work rules to remove employees from the location where the fork truck loads and unloads, and to adhere to ANSI/ITSDF B56.6-2005, Section 6.2.7, which states: "Do not allow anyone to stand or pass under the elevated portion of any rough terrain forklift truck, whether empty or loaded."
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1800
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, and at times prior, employees working below work activities on upper levels of a scaffold were not protected from falling objects in that they did not wear hard hats. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, and at times prior, employees were not protected from fall hazards in that the scaffold they were using was not fully planked in various locations including on the top level where a worker stood on one scaffold plank that reached between the frames on the east end of the scaffold that covered the Big Lots store wall. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1400
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards because the scaffold used while stuccoing a building was not inspected prior to each shift that employees worked on the scaffold. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, and at times prior, the employer had not trained the employees using the scaffold to stucco a building, to recognize and minimize the hazards of working from scaffolds. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, and at times prior, employees climbed the crossbraces to access the scaffold. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, and at times prior, employees were not protected from fall hazards in that sections of the scaffold where employees were working did not have guardrails including on the top level where an employees shoveled stucco, on the east end of the scaffold that covered the Big Lots store wall. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, and at times prior, employees were not protected from overhead falling objects in that the scaffold on which employees were working at different levels did not have toeboards. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, and at times prior, employees were not protected from fall of 11 feet and greater as they worked next to the edge of the overhang above a walkway. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allowed, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) On or about September 5, 2012, and at times prior, employees were not protected from fall hazards in that the ladder used to access the overhang where work operations were conducted did not extend three feet above the landing surface. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238190)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336153606.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.