TAMPA, FL —
OSHA Inspection: HANNAH CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION OF TAMPA BAY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HANNAH CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION OF TAMPA BAY in 410 SOUTH DALE MABRY HWY., TAMPA, FL 33609 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 336212386.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HANNAH CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION OF TAMPA BAY
- Site address
- 410 SOUTH DALE MABRY HWY.
- City
- TAMPA
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33609
- Mailing
- PO BOX 24311, TAMPA, FL 33623
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Sep 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: a. Roof - fall protection was not used on a 3:12 pitched roof during roof coating operations and exposed employee to a 12' fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 9/7/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1440
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. Roof - employer did not train to recognize fall hazards during roof coating operations when there was a 12' fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 9/7/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. Roof - employer did not have a written hazard communication program when material such as, but not limited to Lanco White Seal Roof Coating was used during roof coating operations. Violation observed on or about 9/7/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Sep 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: a. Roof - employer did not have material safety data sheet when material such as, but not limited to Lanco White Seal Roof Coating was used during roof coating operations. Violation observed on or about 9/7/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Roof - employer did not have hazard communication training when material such as, but not limited to Lanco White Seal Roof Coating was used during roof coating operations. Violation observed on or about 9/7/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336212386.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.