CINCINNATI, OH —
OSHA Inspection: PME OF OHIO, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PME OF OHIO, INC. in 518 W. CRESCENTVILLE RD., CINCINNATI, OH 45246 (NAICS 333613). OSHA activity number 336236591.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PME OF OHIO, INC.
- Site address
- 518 W. CRESCENTVILLE RD.
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45246
- Mailing
- 518 W. CRESCENTVILLE RD., CINCINNATI, OH 45246
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333613
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices shall be affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees. a) On or about September 17, 2012 a lock was not affixed to the electrical disconnect on the DoAll bandsaw by each authorized person when there were more than one employee involved in lockout procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer shall ensure that each operator has successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5). a) Employees operating the forklift were not trained to ensure that the operators possessed the knowledge and skills needed to operate a forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $880
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc. a) In the lathe department, employee(s) were exposed to the rotating chucks and jaws on the Victor lathes due to no guard in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $880
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,517 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed parts of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform, excepting runways used exclusively for oiling, or running adjustments, shall be protected by a stationary casing enclosing shafting completely or by a trough enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting as location requires. a) Guarding was not provided for the drilll that turns the table so the parts could get sprayed, exposing employees to rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500
- — Z (S) $1517
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,517 · Current $760 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical and inclined belts shall be enclosed by a guard conforming to standards in paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section. a) Guarding was not provided on the main motor drive belt for the exhaust fan, exposing employees to rotating parts. b) Guarding was not provided on the main motor drive on the Bridge Part drill press, exposing employees to rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $760
- — Z (S) $1517
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed. a) The Company had not conducted periodic inspections of their energy control procedures on at least an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at PME of Ohio, INC.
View PME of Ohio, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333613)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336236591.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.