Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: GERALD FOSCHINI GENERAL MASONRY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GERALD FOSCHINI GENERAL MASONRY in 1801 RITNER ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19145 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 336252788.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gerald Foschini General Masonry for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gerald Foschini General Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1801 RITNER ST
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19145
Mailing
1847 RITNER ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19145
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2012
Abate by
Oct 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):     Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    a) Jobsite: 18th & Ritner Sts:  Employees were working from a fabricated frame scaffolding applying stucco to an exterior wall approximately 18' above ground level with the working platform not fully planked or decked, observed on or about 5/1/12.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1300
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2012
Abate by
Oct 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):     When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:    a) Jobsite 18th & Ritner Sts, Employees were working from a fabricated frame scaffolding applying stucco to the exterior wall from the 3rd working platform. Employees were using crossbraces to access the upper levels of the scaffolding and no other means to access the scaffolding was provided, observed on or about 5/1/12
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2012
Abate by
Oct 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii):     Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.      a) Jobsite, 18th & Ritner Sts:  Employees were working from a fabricated frame scaffolding applying stucco to the exterior wall approximately 18' above the ground level and were not protected from falls. Employees were not using any personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems to protect them from falling, observed on or about 5/1/12.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1300
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2012
Abate by
Dec 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a):     The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    a) Jobsite, 18th & Ritner Sts: Employees were working from a fabricated frame scaffolding applying stucco to the exterior wall up to heights of approximately 18'. Employees were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with this type of scaffolding or the procedures to control or minimize those hazards, observed on or about 5/1/12.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 336252788.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.