NEW HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: CT FRAMERS LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CT FRAMERS LLC in 49 BROOKSIDE BLDG 55, NEW HAVEN, CT 06515 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 336274188.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CT FRAMERS LLC
- Site address
- 49 BROOKSIDE BLDG 55
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06515
- Mailing
- 96 DEPOT ROAD, UNCASVILLE, CT 06382
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 17
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.95 B
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(b): Where employees provided their own protective equipment, the employer did not assure its adequacy, including proper maintenance, and sanitation of such equipment: Jobsite: the employer did not ensure that employee owned full body harness and life lines were adequate.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.502 D04
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(4): The employer did not ensure that all Dee-rings and snap hooks have a minimum tensile strength of 5,000 pounds (22.2kN) Jobsite: The snap hook used by the employee as part of a personal fall arrest system while working from heights of up approximately 23feet 3 inches did not have a minimum tensile strength of at least 5000 pounds.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.502 D05
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(5): Non-locking type snaphooks were used as part of a personal fall arrest system: Jobsite: The snap hook used by the employee as part of a personal fall arrest system while working from heights of up approximately 23feet 3 inches was not a locking type.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.95 D01
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(d)(1): The employer did not provide personel protective equipment, at no cost, to the employees. Jobsite: The employer, required the employees to pay for their full body harnesses that was required for the performance of their job.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336274188.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.