Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GENERAL IMPROVEMENT CO.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of GENERAL IMPROVEMENT CO. in 2724 W. COMMERCE, SAN ANTONIO, TX 75220 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 336289780.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch General Improvement CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for General Improvement CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2724 W. COMMERCE
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
75220
Mailing
2639 BRENNER DR., DALLAS, TX 75220
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:    On or about September 11, 2012, employees were exposed to an eye injury from items such as but not limited to:  roofing material, concrete, and wood while shoveling debris into a wheel barrel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):  Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    On or about September 11, 2012, employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 6 feet in elevation to the ground level below from a scaffold that had 2 of a possible 5 planking while employees were installing the wall frame.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:                                                                                      On or about September 11, 2012, employees were exposed to the hazard of falls from an elevation of approximately 6 feet to the ground level below when installing the wall frame while on a tubular welding scaffold that had 6 of 8 scaffold poles were resting directly on wooden planks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units:     On or about September 11, 2012,  employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 6 feet to the ground level below while installing the wall frame on a one level scaffold that was erected on unstable ground and the poles were set on uneven wood planks and concrete blocks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7):  Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:    On or about September 11, 2012, Employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 6 feet to wood, rocks, and concrete debris at ground level below while installing a wall frame on a one level scaffold, that had hazards such as but not limited to: not fully planked, end poles resting on unstable ground; and on unstable concrete and wood planks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Abate by
Mar 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used and to understand the procedure(s) to control or minimize those hazards:    On or about September 11, 2012, an employee was exposed to a fall of approximately 6 feet in elevation to building materials below such as to but not limited to:  wood planks, rocks, and concrete debris at ground level below while installing a wall frame from a scaffold that had hazards such as but not limited to:  inadequate planking and end poles resting on unstable objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11):  Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about September 11, 2012, an employee was exposed to the hazard of falls from approximately 12 feet in elevation to the ground level below while installing shingles on an approximately 5:12 roof pitch without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(c):  When employees were exposed to falling objects the employer did not require employees to wear hard hats and did not implement measures to prevent objects from falling from higher levels as set forth in (c)(1)-(3) of this section:    On or about September 11, 2012, employees were exposed to a struck by hazard when working at ground level and on scaffold without hard hats from items such as but not limited to:  roofing material and a pneumatic nail gun when employees working above were installing the wall frame and placing shingles on the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $850 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder(s) was/were not secured at its top to a rigid support, and/or a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist the employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:    On or about September 11, 2012, an employee was exposed to a fall of approximately 10 feet to the ground level while mounting and dismounting the protable ladder that extended one foot above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $850
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2013
Abate by
Mar 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1):  The employer failed to ensure that each employee received training by a competent person in ladder safety:    On or about September 11, 2012, an employee was exposed to a fall of approximately 10 feet to the ground level while mounting and dismounting the portable ladder that extended one foot above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336289780.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.