WALLINGFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: FRANK DURAZZO
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FRANK DURAZZO in 11 WEST ST, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 336294582.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FRANK DURAZZO
- Site address
- 11 WEST ST
- City
- WALLINGFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06492
- Mailing
- 95 TERRACE ST, NEW HAVEN, CT 06512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b): Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, employees were engaged in construction on a high slope 5 in 12 pitch garage roof and an 8 in 12 pitch roof at heights between approximately 9'3" and 18 feet without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, employees exposed to fall hazards while working on a high slope 5 in 12 pitch garage roof and an 8 in 12 pitch roof at heights between approximately 9'3" and 18 feet, were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where a portable ladder was used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed: Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, an employee was using a portable, extension ladder to gain access to the roof. The side rails of the ladder were not extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall: Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, employees using ladders carried materials that could cause the employees to lose balance and fall.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A01 III
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and/or stairways had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling the ladders and/or stairways: Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, the employees who were exposed to fall and other hazards had not been trained by a competent person in the proper placement of ladders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.404 B01 II
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupers for personal protection. Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) or an assured grounding program was not used with (but not limited to) the electrical extension cord that powered the portable circular saw used on the house under renovation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336294582.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.