Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANK DURAZZO

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FRANK DURAZZO in 11 WEST ST, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 336294582.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Frank Durazzo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Frank Durazzo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FRANK DURAZZO
Site address
11 WEST ST
City
WALLINGFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06492
Mailing
95 TERRACE ST, NEW HAVEN, CT 06512
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Sep 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b):  Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, employees were engaged in construction on a high slope 5 in 12 pitch garage roof and an 8 in 12 pitch roof at heights between approximately 9'3" and 18 feet without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Sep 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, employees exposed to fall hazards while working on a high slope 5 in 12 pitch garage roof and an 8 in 12 pitch roof at heights between approximately 9'3" and 18 feet, were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Sep 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where a portable ladder was used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, an employee was using a portable, extension ladder to gain access to the roof. The side rails of the ladder were not extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B22

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Sep 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:  Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, employees using ladders carried materials that could cause the employees to lose balance and fall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Sep 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and/or stairways had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling the ladders and/or stairways:  Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, the employees who were exposed to fall and other hazards had not been trained by a competent person in the proper placement of ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.404 B01 II

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Sep 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupers for personal protection.  Worksite: On or about September 12, 2012, and times prior thereto, a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) or an assured grounding program was not used with (but not limited to) the electrical extension cord that powered the portable circular saw used on the house under renovation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336294582.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.