PAWTUCKET, RI —
OSHA Inspection: SPEEDY JOE CONSTRUCTION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SPEEDY JOE CONSTRUCTION in 141 SAYLES AVENUE, PAWTUCKET, RI 02860 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 336376983.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SPEEDY JOE CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 141 SAYLES AVENUE
- City
- PAWTUCKET
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02860
- Mailing
- 93 WEST 6TH STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.252 A
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.252(a): An enclosed chute of wood, or equivalent material, was not used where materials were dropped more than 20 feet to points lying outside the exterior walls of the building(s): a. Jobsite: The employer did not provide an enclosed chute of wood, or equivalent material, when the roofing material was dropped more than 20 feet from the roof to the ground.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: a. Jobsite: Employees working on a roof, near the overhead power lines, were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing the lines or other means.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. Jobsite: Employees working on a roof, exposed to a fall of approximately 20 feet, were not provided with an adequate fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. Jobsite: The employer did not provide a training program for each employee exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336376983.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.