ALICE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ECO MUD DISPOSAL
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of ECO MUD DISPOSAL in 1106 COUNTY ROAD 448, ALICE, TX 78332 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 336427182.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ECO MUD DISPOSAL
- Site address
- 1106 COUNTY ROAD 448
- City
- ALICE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78332
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 2502, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78403
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- Employees
- 28
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A05
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Infrequently used pit or trap door floor opening(s) with the cover(s) removed were not constantly attended by someone or protected on all exposed sides by removable standard railings: Northeast corner of Tri-Flow Platform floor, northeast area of the workplace: On 09/20/2012, employees engaged in workplace activities were exposed to fall hazards through a floor opening that was not guarded or constantly attended by someone. The unguarded floor opening was 22 inches long, 14 inches wide, with a fall distance of 66 inches to the next lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent). West wash-out drain pit, center area of workplace: On 09/20/2012, Employees worked at or near the edge of a drain pit during truck washout operatons. The drain pit did not have adequate guardrails to prevent a fall into the 16 foot deep pit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2400
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.106 G08
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that, in addition to the previous restrictions of this paragraph; that conspicuous and legible signs prohibiting smoking were posted within sight of the employee being served. The motors of all equipment being fueled shall be shut off during the fueling operation: Diesel Fuel Storage Tank: fuel/maintenance storage site, northwest area of the workplace: On 09/20/2012, the employer did not ensure that storage tanks that contained flammable liquids used by employees to support workplace activities were posted with "No Smoking" signs. Employees were exposed to thermal burn injuries, from contact with flammable liquid fires initiated by employee smoking activities during refueling activities at flamable liquid storage areas.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2450
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: Throughout the workplace: On 09/20/2012, the employer did not conduct a workplace assessment to determine what hazards were present, the personal protective equipment required for employees exposed to those hazards; and a list of mandatory task specific personal protective equipment. Employees exposed to chemical burns from contact with hazardous chemicals while engaged in the following activities were not provided with adequate personal protective equipment due to the lack of a written workplace hazard assessment document: a. Washing pits, Center of the workplace: Tank trailer washout operations, b. Tri-Flow Platform: Mud disposal waste processing operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): Throughout the workplace: On 09/20/2012, the employer did not have a written certification stating that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed to determine what hazards were present, the personal protective equipment required for employees exposed to those hazards; and a list of mandatory task specific personal protective equipment. Employees exposed to chemical burns from contact with hazardous chemicals while engaged in the following activities were not provided with adequate personal protective equipment due to the lack of written certification stating that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed: a. Washing pits, Center of the workplace: Tank trailer washout operations, b. Tri-Flow Platform: Mud disposal waste processing operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 D03
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations, including but not limited to purging, inerting, flushing, or ventilating the permit space as necessary to eliminate or control atmospheric hazards: Throughout the facility, on 09/20/2012, the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations for employees engaged in tanker truck washout of mud disposal waste residue. Employees were exposed to inhalation hazards from contact with confined space airborne chemical vapors while placing their upper body and head into the tank interior while cleaning the tank interior surfaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(5): Fan blade guard(s) were not provided where the periphery of the blades was less than seven feet from the floor or working level: Northeast section of Tri-Flow Platform, northeast area of the workplace: On 09/20/2012, the employer did not ensure that the blades of the pedestal mounted ventilator device used by employees engaged in workplace actvities was guarded. Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from contact with the unguarded, ventilator fan blades operating at 1800 rpm, at a height of 38 inches above the platform floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): West side of mud tanks, east area of the workplace: On 09/20/2012, employees engaged in workplace activities were exposed to struck-by hazards from contact with unguarded pulleys rotating at 1800 rpm at a height of 36 inches above the ground. The unguarded pulleys were attached to the Hydraulic Pump Engine/Power Pack and used to support engine accessories. (a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS) (DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY)
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): West side of mud tanks, east area of the workplace: On 09/20/2012, employees engaged in workplace activities were exposed to struck-by hazards from contact with unguarded drive belts rotating at 1800 rpm at a height of 36 inches above the ground. The unguarded drive belts were used to support engine accessories and were attached to the Hydraulic Pump Engine/Power Pack. (a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS) (DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY)
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: Northeast section of Tri-Flow Platform, northeast area of the workplace: On 09/20/2012, employees engaged in workplace activities were exposed to electrical shock hazards from contact with energized, ventilator fan whose motor was not grounded. The ventilator fan motor operated at 120 volts AC, at a height of 38 inches above the floor, and was powered by a 2 conductor flexible cord connected to a 2 prong male plug.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose: Northeast section of Tri-Flow Platform, northeast area of the workplace: On 09/20/2012, employees engaged in workplace activities were exposed to electrical shock hazards from contact with exposed, energized, ventilator motor conductors. The exposed conductors operated at 120 volts AC, at a height of 48 inches above the floor, and located within the motor capacitor junction box missing a cover.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Throughout the facility, on 09/20/2012, the employer did not implement, or maintain at the workplace a written hazardous chemical program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals while engaged in mud disposal waste handling activities. Employees were exposed to nervous system disorders, liver/kidney injuries, from contact with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to toluene, tri methyl benzene, substituted benzene, and substituted naphthalene.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: Throughout the workplace: On 09/20/2012, the employer did not ensure that storage tanks for hazardous chemicals used by employees to support workplace activities were labeled as to hazard identity. Employees were exposed to skin and liver/kidney injuries, from repeated contact with the following hazardous chemicals not labeled as to hazard identity: a. Diesel Fuel Storage Tank: fuel and maintenance storage area, northwest area of the workplace, b. North, North Center, and South Tanks for Polymer Chemical Storage: Center of Tri-flow area, workplace center section.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1470
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: Throughout the worksite: On 09/20/2012, the employer did not ensure that storage tanks for hazardous chemicals used by employees to support workplace activities were labeled as to hazard warning. Employees were exposed to skin and liver/kidney injuries, from repeated contact with the following hazardous chemicals not labeled as to hazard warning to include health, flammability, and reactivity hazards: a. Diesel Fuel Storage Tank: Fuel and Maintenance Storage Area, northwest area of the workplace, b. North, North Center, and South Tanks for Polymer Chemical Storagea, Center of Tri-Flow area, east area of the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336427182.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.