Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ULTRA TAB LABORATORIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ULTRA TAB LABORATORIES, INC. in 50 TOC DRIVE, HIGHLAND, NY 12528 (NAICS 325412). OSHA activity number 336445382.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ultra TAB Laboratories, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ultra TAB Laboratories, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
50 TOC DRIVE
City
HIGHLAND
State
NY
ZIP
12528
Mailing
50 TOC DRIVE, HIGHLAND, NY 12528
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325412
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E09 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Jan 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(iii): Combustible waste material and residues in a building or unit operating area was not kept to a minimum, stored in covered metal receptacles and disposed of daily:    a). On or about 9/5/12, on site, for employees in the liquids blending room, that spray isopropyl alcohol (IPA), a class 1B liquid, on tank components. The employees use rags to wipe the IPA. Employees are disposing rags with regular trash. The employer did not provide a metal receptacle to dispose the rags containing IPA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2275
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Mar 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures:     a). On or about 9/5/12, on site, in the liquids blending room, for employees conducting cleaning A and B processes. The employees are required to don a SAS 8610 N95 particulate respirator. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program for those employees to include a medical evaluation and fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2275
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Jan 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was  fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     a). On or about 9/5/12, on site, in the liquids blending room, for employees conducting cleaning A and B processes. The employees are required to don a SAS 8610 N95 particulate respirator. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Jan 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph:    a). a). On or about 9/5/12, on site, in the liquids blending room, for employees conducting  cleaning A and B processes. The employees are required to don a SAS 8610 N95 particulate respirator. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program for those employees to include a medical evaluation and fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Jan 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a). On or about 9/5/12, on site, in the liquids blender room, for employees dispensing 10 kilograms of Citric Acid Anhydrous, during the cleaning process. The employer did not provide an eye wash/shower unit in the room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2275
  • — Z (S) $3500

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Dec 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $455 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.4(a): Each employer required by this Part to keep records of fatalities, injuries, and illnesses did not record each fatality, injury and illness that was work-related:    a). On or about 9/5/12, Ultra Tab Laboratories, Inc., for the injury that occurred on 8/21/2012. The injury resulted to medical treatment that involved presecriptions and approximately 11 days of lost work. The employer did not record the injury until the day of the inspection on the current OSHA 300 log.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $455
  • — Z (O) $700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336445382.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.