Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CATOOSA TEST FACILITY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CATOOSA TEST FACILITY in 360513 E 5500 RD, JENNINGS, OK 74038 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 336457395.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Catoosa Test Facility — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Catoosa Test Facility is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
360513 E 5500 RD
City
JENNINGS
State
OK
ZIP
74038
Mailing
PO BOX 159, JENNINGS, OK 74038
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Feb 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):     The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    Rig #3 mud pump #1 area:  On or about September 19, 2012, and times prior to, employees operating the rig worked around and maintained the rig mud system.  Mud pump #1 high pressure discharge hoses did not have restraints installed at the hose connections exposing the employees to the hazard of being struck by a whipping hose end.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):     Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    Drilling rigs 3 and 11:  On or about September 19, 2012, employees operating two drilling rigs in support of oilfield drilling technology development worked on areas of the rig that did not have guard rails installed and no other form of fall protection was used.  This exposed the employees to the hazard of falls over 4 feet in the following instances:    a)  Rig #3 V door opening.    b)  Rig #11 V door opening.    c)  Rig #3 mud mixing platform.    d)  Rig #11 mud mixing platform.    e)  Rig #3 cat walk.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.27 D05

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.27(d)(5):     Ladder safety devices where not used on tower, water tank, and chimney ladders over 20 feet in unbroken length in lieu of cage protection:    Drilling rigs derrick:  On or about September 19, 2012, and times prior to, employees working on the derricks of the drilling rigs accessed the derrick uncaged ladders to reach the derrick work positions without ladder safety devices installed.  This exposed the employees to the hazard of falling from the elevated ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a):     Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered    On or about September 19, 2012, and times prior to, the use of personal protective equipment was lacking for employees engaged in the operation and maintenance of an oil/gas drilling technology development support facility .  This exposed the employees to the hazards of corrosive chemical contact, vehicle accidents, and falls in the following instances:    a)  Employees involved in mixing drilling mud operations that used corrosive material did not utilize personal protective equipment.    b)  Employees operated a backhoe that was missing its seat and seatbelts.    c)  Employees working the drilling rigs derrick boards were not using fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Apr 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a forklift:    On or about September 19, 2012, and times prior to, employees engaged in the operation of the drilling rig used a rough terrain forklift to support the operations.  The employees operating the forklift have not received the specified training.  This exposed the employees to the hazards of forklift accidents and being struck by the forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Apr 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1):     Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:    On or about September 19, 2012, employees used and worked around a rough terrain forklift used to support the drilling rig operations.  The forklift had a disconnected back alarm, inoperative headlights, missing seat, and no operational horn.  This exposed the employees working around the forklift to the hazard of being struck by the forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Feb 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Rig #3 mud pump #1:  On or about September 19, 2012, employees operating the rig mud system worked around and maintained the mud pump.  The mud pump pressure relief valve did not have a guard installed exposing the employees to the hazard of being struck by the valve shear pin.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1):     Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    Vac Truck:  On or about September 19, 2012, and times prior to, employees used a vacuum truck to support drilling activities.  The vacuum pump pulley and V belts were not guarded.  This exposed the employees to the hazard of being caught in in-running nip points.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i):     Horizontal belts which had both runs 42 inches or less from the floor level were not fully enclosed by guards conforming to requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  Horizontal belts and ropes.        Vac Truck:  On or about September 19, 2012, and times prior to, employees used a vacuum truck to support drilling activities.  The vacuum pump pulley and V belts were not guarded.  This exposed the employees to the hazard of being caught in in-running nip points.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336457395.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.