BRANFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MILL POND VETERINARY HOSPITAL, P.C.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MILL POND VETERINARY HOSPITAL, P.C. in 229 E. MAIN ST, BRANFORD, CT 06405 (NAICS 541940). OSHA activity number 336462981.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MILL POND VETERINARY HOSPITAL, P.C.
- Site address
- 229 E. MAIN ST
- City
- BRANFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06405
- Mailing
- 229 E. MAIN ST, BRANFORD, CT 06405
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 541940
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": Facility: Two exit doors were not marked by a sign reading "Exit".
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.38 C05
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(5): The employer did not have site specific procedures to be followed by employees performing rescue or medical duties: Facility: The employer's fire safety policy did not have site specific procedures to be followed by employees performing rescue or medical duties.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $280 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent. Facility: On or about September 20, 2012, and times prior thereto, the employer's forms used for recording injuries and illnesses were not equivalent forms for the calendar year 2012.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $280
- — Z (O) $400
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: Facility: A portable fire extinguisher was not mounted so that it was readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: Facility: The portable fire extinguishers provided by the employer were not subjected to an annual maintenance check.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 541940)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336462981.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.