HUBER HEIGHTS, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: STEVE DIXON
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of STEVE DIXON in LOT 549 6007 BLACKWOOD WAY, HUBER HEIGHTS, OH 45424 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 336514989.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STEVE DIXON
- Site address
- LOT 549 6007 BLACKWOOD WAY
- City
- HUBER HEIGHTS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45424
- Mailing
- 8 MIDDLE ST., MEDWAY, OH 45341
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Programs did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers: a) The employer did not ensure that a competent person first conducted jobsite inspection to identify and correct fall hazard conditions before starting roof work.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502. a) Employee installing new shingles on a 6 in 12 pitch roof section were not provided conventional or personal fall protection and employees were at the roof edge exposed to a 12 feet and greater fall hazards to the lower ground level.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336514989.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.