Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MORGANTOWN TECHNICAL SERVICES A DIVISION OF SWANSON INDUSTRIES

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MORGANTOWN TECHNICAL SERVICES A DIVISION OF SWANSON INDUSTRIES in 303 MEADOW RIDGE ROAD, MOUNT MORRIS, PA 15349 (NAICS 333131). OSHA activity number 336557384.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Morgantown Technical Services a Division of Swanson Industries — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Morgantown Technical Services a Division of Swanson Industries is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
303 MEADOW RIDGE ROAD
City
MOUNT MORRIS
State
PA
ZIP
15349
Mailing
303 MEADOW RIDGE ROAD, MOUNT MORRIS, PA 15349
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333131
Employees
43
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Nov 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,600 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):     A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8 hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA:    a)  Facility:  On or about October 4, 2012, the employer did not institute a continuing effective hearing conservation program when employee noise exposures exceeded an 8 hour time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA.  An employee designated as a Welder was exposed to noise at a level of 77.4% of the allowable limit during a 281 minute sampling period on October 4, 2012.  This exposure is equivalent to a sound level of 88.2 dBA for the dose and time of employee exposure and is 1.5 times in excess of the 85 dBA action level (50%) at which the hearing conservation program is required.    b)  Facility:  On or about October 4, 2012, an employee designated as a Welder was exposed to noise at a level of 185.0% of the allowable limit during a 281 minute sampling period on October 4, 2012.  This exposure is equivalent to a sound level of 94.4 dBA for the dose and time of employee exposure and is 3.7 times in excess of the 85 dBA action level (50%) at which the hearing conservation program is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2600
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.95 G05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Nov 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(ii):     Where mobile test vans were used to meet the audiometric testing obligation, the employer did not obtain a valid baseline audiogram within 1 year of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level:      a)  Facility:  On or about October 4, 2012, the employer did not obtain a valid baseline audiogram within 1 year of an employee's first exposure to noise at or above the action level.  An employee designated as a welder was exposed to noise at a time weighted average exposure of 88.2 dBA, and this employee did not have a baseline audiogram within 1 year of employment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 G06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Nov 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6):     The employer did not obtain a new audiogram annually for each employee exposed to noise at or above an 8 hour time weighted average exposure of 85 decibels:      a)  Facility:  On or about October 4, 2012, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram annually for each employee exposed to noise at or above an 8 hour time weighted average exposure of 85 dBA.   (See descriptions of employee noise exposures in Citation 1, Item 1a, Instances a and b).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B05 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Nov 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i):     Visible gauges or audible alarms or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or insure that the required air velocity is maintained:    a)  Paint Booth Area:  On or about September 21, 2012, visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices were not installed on the spray booth to indicate that the required air velocity is maintained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Dec 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $2,600
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv):     Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters shall be protected with approved automatic sprinklers.      a)  Paint Booth Area:  On or about September 21, 2012, the space on the downstreatm and upstream sides of the filters of the spray booth were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2600
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Nov 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9):     A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction:      a)  Paint Booth Area:  On or about September 21, 2012, a clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides of the spray booth was not maintained from storage or combustible construction including but not limited to empty paint containers and wood.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 G07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7):     "No Smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color background were not conspicuously posted at all spraying areas and paint storage rooms.        a)  Paint Booth Area:  On or about September 21, 2012, "No Smoking" signs were not posted at the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Oct 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f):     The employer did not ensure that an employee who is required to use any respirator with a negative or positive pressure tight fitting facepiece, is fit tested with the same make, moodel, style and size of respirator that is used:    a) Paint Booth Area:  On or about September 21, 2012, the employer did not ensure that an employee designated as a painter was fit tested prior to wearing a full face respirator which was required in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Oct 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k):     The employer did not provided effective training to employees who are required to use respirators:        a) Paint Booth Area:  On or about September 21, 2012, the employer did not provide respirator training to an employee designated as a painter who was required to wear a respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2012
Abate by
Oct 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6):     Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and hazard statement:    a)  Paint Booth Area:  On or about September 21, 2012, a container of paint thinner was not labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and hazard statement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336557384.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.