YAZOO CITY, MS — 2012-09-26 00:00:00

OSHA Inspection: SHACKELFORD CONSTRUCTION & HAULING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On 2012-09-26 00:00:00, OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SHACKELFORD CONSTRUCTION & HAULING, LLC in 6789 HWY 49 FRONTAGE RD., YAZOO CITY, MS 39194 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 336572987.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Shackelford Construction & Hauling, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Shackelford Construction & Hauling, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment: SHACKELFORD CONSTRUCTION & HAULING, LLC
Site address: 6789 HWY 49 FRONTAGE RD.
City: YAZOO CITY
State: MS
ZIP: 39194
Mailing: PO BOX 301, BENTON, MS 39039

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type: Planned (H)
Scope: Partial (B)
Discipline: Safety
Advance notice: No
Union status: B

When did the case open and close?

Opened: 2012-09-26 00:00:00
Closing conference: 2012-09-26 00:00:00
Case closed: 2013-10-18 00:00:00
Last modified: 2026-07-21 00:00:00
Data loaded: 2026-07-22 00:19:52

Establishment context

NAICS code: 237110
Employees: 4
Ownership type: A

Citations

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed

Issued: Oct 25, 2012
Abate by: Nov 8, 2012
Penalty: Initial $1,360 · Current $900 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:      (a)  East Side of Construction Site - On or about September 26, 2012 employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while working in a trench and they were not protected by wearing hard hats.

Recent events (2)

2012-11-19 00:00:00 — I (S) $900
2012-10-25 00:00:00 — Z (S) $1360

1926.651 J02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed

Issued: Oct 25, 2012
Abate by: Nov 8, 2012
Penalty: Initial $2,040 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2):     Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary.    (a)   West Side of Trench - September 26, 2012 employees were exposed to struck-by and cave-in hazards while working in a trench and they were not protected by the spoil pile being set back at least 2 feet from the west edge of the trench.

Recent events (2)

2012-11-19 00:00:00 — I (S) $0
2012-10-25 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2040

1926.651 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed

Issued: Oct 25, 2012
Abate by: Nov 8, 2012
Penalty: Initial $1,360 · Current $900 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2):     A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees:      (a)   Trench, East Side of Construction Site - On or about September 9, 2012 employees were expsosed to cave-in hazards from a trench more than 4 feet in depth and they were not protected by a ladder placed in the trench for emergency egress.

Recent events (2)

2012-11-19 00:00:00 — I (S) $900
2012-10-25 00:00:00 — Z (S) $1360

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed

Issued: Oct 25, 2012
Abate by: Nov 8, 2012
Penalty: Initial $2,040 · Current $1,700 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1):     Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins or indications of failure of protective systems.    (a)   Trench on the East Side of the Construction site - On or about September 26, 2012 employees were exposed to cave-in and struck-by hazards while working in a trench and they were not protected by daily inspections by a competant person for evidence of possible cave-ins or indications of failures of protective systems.

Recent events (2)

2012-11-19 00:00:00 — I (S) $1700
2012-10-25 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2040

1926.652 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed

Issued: Oct 25, 2012
Abate by: Nov 8, 2012
Penalty: Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.652(a):     29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with paragraph (b) or (c) of this section:    (a) East Side of Worksite - On or about September 26, 2012 employees were exposed to cave-in hazards while working in a trench over 5 feet deep and they were not protected by proper sloping and benching systems or support or shield systems.

Recent events (2)

2012-11-19 00:00:00 — I (S) $2000
2012-10-25 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed

Issued: Oct 25, 2012
Abate by: Nov 8, 2012
Penalty: Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)      (a)   South Side of Construction Site - On or about September 26, 2012 employees were exposed to health hazards while working near or traveling near a diesel fuel tank on a trailer. The diesel tank was labeled with the chemical contained in the tank.

Recent events (2)

2012-11-19 00:00:00 — I (O) $0
2012-10-25 00:00:00 — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed

Issued: Oct 25, 2012
Abate by: Nov 8, 2012
Penalty: Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)      (a)   South Side of Construction Site - On or about September 26, 2012 employees were exposed to fire hazards while working near or traveling near a diesel fuel tank. The diesel tank was not marked with a hazard warning sign.

Recent events (2)

2012-11-19 00:00:00 — I (O) $0
2012-10-25 00:00:00 — Z (O) $0

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237110)

Jul 17, 2026 FOX Tapping INC. · COLUMBIA, PA Jul 17, 2026 Traxon Construction INC. · POUND, VA Jul 17, 2026 PTS Contractors, INC. · GREEN BAY, WI Jul 16, 2026 S&E Utility Contracting, INC. · SWISSVALE, PA Jul 16, 2026 111607 - Pciroads LLC · MINNEAPOLIS, MN

More inspections in MS

Jul 1, 2026 Thermo-Kool · LAUREL, MS Jul 1, 2026 Newly Weds Foods, INC. · HORN LAKE, MS Jul 1, 2026 Double R Gautier, LLC · GAUTIER, MS Jun 30, 2026 Hyve Solutions · OLIVE BRANCH, MS Jun 30, 2026 Steve Wilson Enterprise · GAUTIER, MS

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336572987.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.