Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HI-STANDARD MACHINING COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HI-STANDARD MACHINING COMPANY, INC. in 2621 EATON LANE, RACINE, WI 53404 (NAICS 332721). OSHA activity number 336607791.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hi-Standard Machining Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hi-Standard Machining Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2621 EATON LANE
City
RACINE
State
WI
ZIP
53404
Mailing
2621 EATON LANE, RACINE, WI 53404
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332721
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $867 · Current $433 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    (a) The employer did not ensure that the tool rest were properly adjusted, on the grinders utilized for off-hand grinding.  This exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $433
  • — Z (S) $867

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    (a)  The employer did not ensure that the tongue guards were properly adjusted, on the grinders utilized for off-hand grinding.  This exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $510 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    (a) The shaft end and nut on the Rockwell Grinder, which was being utilized to polish metal parts, was not properly guarded.  This exposed employees to entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $510
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a)  The employer did not develop a hazard communication program to provide employees with information on the hazardous material utilized as part of their normal work duties.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area and chemical-specific information was not always available through labels and material safety data sheets.    (a)  The employer did not provide employees, which are exposed to hazardous materials while conducting their normal work duties, with effective hazard communication training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:    (a)  The employer did not ensure that all containers in the facility were properly labeled to identify the hazardous material which they contained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336607791.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.