Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SURGICAL SUITE; A DIVISION OF DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF ATLANTA

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SURGICAL SUITE; A DIVISION OF DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF ATLANTA in 5555 PEACHTREE DUNWOODY RD STE 190, ATLANTA, GA 30343 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 336615398.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Surgical Suite; a Division of Dermatology Associates of Atlanta — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Surgical Suite; a Division of Dermatology Associates of Atlanta is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5555 PEACHTREE DUNWOODY RD STE 190
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30343
Mailing
5555 PEACHTREE DUNWOODY RD STE 180, ATLANTA, GA 30342
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621111
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Dec 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually:    a) The employer did not conduct an annual review on the exposure control plan to verify all components of the plan were followed to ensure the safety of the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.1030 C01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Dec 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan:    a) The employer did not solicit input from exposed employees on safer methods of compliance, such as but not limited to safe sharps.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Dec 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure:    Sutures and scalpels used at the facility were not equipped with engineered sharps protection, exposing employees to the increased risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens due to contaminated needlesticks and other percutaneous injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.1030 C01 IV B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Dec 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B): The review and update of the exposure control plan did not document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure:    a) The employer did not document the annual consideration and implementation of safer medical devices as a method to minimize cuts and/or needle sticks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Dec 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1):  Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:      a) Employees were exposed to burn and tripping hazards caused by a fire extinguisher in an unmarked location in the area outside of surgery room II.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336615398.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.