GREENWICH, CT —
OSHA Inspection: SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC in 1041 NORTH STREET, GREENWICH, CT 06831 (NAICS 562991). OSHA activity number 336616784.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC
- Site address
- 1041 NORTH STREET
- City
- GREENWICH
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06831
- Mailing
- PO BOX 546, NORWALK, CT 06852
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562991
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were exposed to overhead hazards were provided with and required to wear hard hats.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1120
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.651 J02
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Employees were not protected from excavated or other materials or equipment that could pose a hazard by falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all excavated materials were removed and kept at least two feet from the edge of the excavation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.651 A
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(a): All surface encumbrances that were located so as to create a hazard to employees were not removed or supported, as necessary, to safeguard employees: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that side walls of the 15 foot deep excavation were free and clear of surface encumbrances such as, but not limited to, a large delivery type truck mounted crane which was operating directly on the edge of the excavation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees: Worksite: Employees were working in an excavation which did not have a ladder or other adequate means egress present.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): An inspection of the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the 15 foot deep excavation had been inspected by a competent person prior to allowing employees to enter and work in the excavation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 H01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(h)(1): Employees were working in excavations in which there was accumulated water, or excavations in which water was accumulating, and adequate precautions had not been taken to protect employees against the hazards posed by water accumulation. Worksite: Employees were working in an excavation where accumulated water was present and no measures were taken to remove the water or protect the employees from the hazards related to collapse.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c). Worksite: Employees were working in an excavation that was up to 15 feet deep without any form of cave-in protection in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562991)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336616784.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.