CHIPLEY, FL —
OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN FAMILY HEALTHCARE, P.A.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SOUTHERN FAMILY HEALTHCARE, P.A. in 1376 BRICKYARD ROAD SUITE 5, CHIPLEY, FL 32428 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 336627989.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOUTHERN FAMILY HEALTHCARE, P.A.
- Site address
- 1376 BRICKYARD ROAD SUITE 5
- City
- CHIPLEY
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32428
- Mailing
- 1376 BRICKYARD ROAD SUITE 5, CHIPLEY, FL 32428
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621111
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually: a. On or about October 1, 2012, the employer did not conduct an annual review of the Exposure Control Plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.1030 C01 V
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan: a. On or about October 1, 2012, the employer did not solicit input from employees who were potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps on the identification, evaluation, and selection of effective engineering controls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure: a. On or about October 1, 2012, engineering controls such as, but not limited to, needles with engineering protection were not used to guard against employee exposure to needles potentially contaminated with bloodborne pathogens when giving injections.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet: a. On or about October 1, 2012, a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present in the facility was not included in the company's written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area: a. On or about October 1, 2012, the employer did not provide information and training to employees who had exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to isopropanol.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621111)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336627989.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.