RANDOLPH, MA —
OSHA Inspection: ECONOCORP INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ECONOCORP INCORPORATED in 72 PACELLA PARK DRIVE, RANDOLPH, MA 02368 (NAICS 333298). OSHA activity number 336630785.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ECONOCORP INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 72 PACELLA PARK DRIVE
- City
- RANDOLPH
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02368
- Mailing
- 72 PACELLA PARK DRIVE, RANDOLPH, MA 02368
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333298
- Employees
- 48
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: Machine Shop: The cutting tools and pinchpoints created by the tool changer and the the parts table were not guarded at the 3 CNC Milling Machines.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2450
- — C (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): Assembly and Test Dept. : A pulley and belt drive of a packaging machine was not guarded while the machine was undergoing a test run.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1190
- — C (S) $2380
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed: Assembly and Test Area: A chain and sprocket wheel drive was not guarded while a worker was testing a packaging machine.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Assembly and Testing: The covers of the electrical control panels are not closed and live electrical parts at motor starter boxes are exposed.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1190
- — C (S) $2380
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignment: Assembly and Testing Area: Employees make adjustments at control panels of packaging machines while the panels are energized.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: Assembly and Test Area: Employees making adjustments in energized electrical control panels for packaging machines did not have gloves to protect against electrical shock or electrical burns and an assessment was not performed to see if the workers need more than gloves and goggles while working at an opened panel box.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 G01 I
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- May 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $893 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(i): Flexible cords and cables were not approved or conditions of use and location: Machine Shop: The cord of a cutoff saw was damaged.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $892.5
- — C (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affected capacity and safe operation were performed by the customer or user without manufacturers written approval, and the capacity, operation and maintenance instruction plates, tags or decals were not changed accordingly: Shipping Area: The employer did not get permission from the manufacturer of the Crown Forklift to use fork extensions for moving long pallets containing packaging equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Oct 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): When trucks are equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, it was not requested that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: Shipping Area: The Crown Fork Truck did not have a capacity plate for when the fork extensions are used.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333298)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336630785.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.