Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TE CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TE CONSTRUCTION in 363 BRUSSELLES STREET, SAINT MARYS, PA 15857 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 336631981.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch TE Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TE Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TE CONSTRUCTION
Site address
363 BRUSSELLES STREET
City
SAINT MARYS
State
PA
ZIP
15857
Mailing
184 DUTCH HOLLOW ROAD, WILCOX, PA 15870
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b):     A.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, main roofs of the residence, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  Employees performing roofing work were not utilizing a mean or methods of fall protection when exposed to a fall hazard. Fall heights ranged from 8-ft up to 18.3 feet.    B.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, front porch roof, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  Employees performing roofing work were not utilizing a mean or methods of fall protection when exposed to a 10 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    A.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, front of the residence, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  Employees were not provided with fall protection training. Employees performing roofing work were exposed to fall hazard hazards. Fall heights ranged from 8-ft up to 18.3 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    A.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, front of the residence, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  Employees were utilizing a Werner FE1020-2 fiberglass extension ladder to gain access to the porch roof.  The ladder was only extended one foot above the porch roof.    B.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, front of the residence, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  Employees were utilizing a Werner fiberglass folding ladder in the folded position to gain access from the porch roof to the main roof of the house.  The ladders side rails extended less than 1-foot above the roof line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):     Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:    A.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, front of the residence, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  Employees were utilizing a Werner fiberglass folding ladder in the folded position to gain access from the porch roof to the main roof of the house.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    A.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, front of the residence, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  Employees who were utilizing a Werner FE1020-2 fiberglass extension ladder and a Werner fiberglass folding ladder to gain access to various roof structures on the residence were not provided with ladder safety training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.28(a):     The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions.    A.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, front of the residence, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  An employee on-site was removing shingles and nails from the porch roof of the structure.  The employee was not utilzing safety eyewear. Worker was wearing prescription eyewear that was not designed and manufactured to be utilized as safety eye wear.     B.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, front of the residence, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  An employee on the lower porch roof was not wearing head protection when an employee over was removing roof jack backets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):     The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    A.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, front of the residence, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  Employees were not provided with training on personal protective equipment training.   Personnel protective equipment available at the job site included but was not limited to eye protection and hard hats.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.20 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    A.)  TE Construction, 363 Brusselles Street, St Marys PA  15857, on or about October 1, 2012 and times prior thereto:  Employees were not provided with a safety and health program related to topics, including, but not limited to, fall protection, ladder safety and personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View TE Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336631981.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.